CA CA - Los Angeles, WhtFem UP11403, >60, hit by cars on I-5, Jan'91

Discussion in 'The Unidentified' started by CarlK90245, Jul 28, 2013.

  1. CarlK90245

    CarlK90245 UID Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    8,042
    Likes Received:
    2,701
    Trophy Points:
    113
    NamUs UP # 11403 https://identifyus.org/en/cases/11403

    Unidentified White Female

    Found January 03, 1991 at In Los Angeles, Los Angeles County CA

    Vital Statistics

    * Age: Over 60
    * Height: 64" (5 feet 4 inches)
    * Weight: 184
    * Hair Color: Grey
    * Scars & Marks: Transverse and paramedian longitudinal scars on lower abdomen​

    Circumstances
    * Comments: On 1/3/1991 @ 0300 hours the decedent was walking on the S/B I-5 freeway when she was struck by multiple vehicles.​

    Clothing and Accesories
    * Clothing: Purple & white robe (1) blue sock; red pajama bottoms; red & black underwear; white bra
    * Jewelry: 1 y/m band with clear stone; 1 w/m band; 1 beaded bracelet; 1 pair y/m earrings​

    Identifiers
    * Dental: (No teeth, full set of dentures found with decedent)
    * DNA: Not Available
    * Fingerprints: Available (Sent to CA DOJ with negative results)​
     


  2. CarlK90245

    CarlK90245 UID Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    8,042
    Likes Received:
    2,701
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Amalia Perez looks like a very solid possible for this Jane Doe.

    [​IMG]

    http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/p/perez_amalia.html

    * Date LKA (January 2, 1991) is the day prior to the Jane Doe's death (which occurred at 3:00 am in the morning on January 3, 1991)
    * She was LKA in Los Angeles
    * Age over 60 matches
    * Grey Hair Matches
    * Dentures Match
    * Abdominal Scar matches
    * "Dependent Adult" is consistent with someone who would be walking down freeway in her pajamas.

    The weight and height are off, but the other factors are too close to ignore.
     
  3. zinc

    zinc Active Member

    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    With those dates, yeah, I'd run with it. The age on the NamUs page is a minimum, so not a problem. The weight discrepancy bothers me more than the height, but all it takes to change an MP's reported weight is a mix of old biodata (e.g. weight from a driver's license not updated in 5 years) and medical conditions or medication.

    Here is one other weaker possible. Biodata is okay, DLC is off.

    Maria De Jesus Valdovinos
    Missing Since: February 8, 1991 from Los Angeles, California
    http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/v/valdovinos_maria.html
    http://doenetwork.org/cases/982dfca.html
    http://dojapp.doj.ca.gov/missing/detail.asp?FCN=2749104433210
     
  4. Roselvr

    Roselvr Ask me how to get your loved one in NamUs

    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    2,836
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Looks great Carl! Good luck!

    .
     
  5. carbuff

    carbuff Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    24,883
    Likes Received:
    34,936
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We've seen height and weight be off by more than that...it looks like a very likely possible to me.
     
  6. alreetlike

    alreetlike Wait and hope.

    Messages:
    1,287
    Likes Received:
    232
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Amalia Perez appears to be a great match.
     
  7. CarlK90245

    CarlK90245 UID Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    8,042
    Likes Received:
    2,701
    Trophy Points:
    113
  8. CarlK90245

    CarlK90245 UID Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    8,042
    Likes Received:
    2,701
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I just talked to Daniel Machian to follow up on this case, and two others.

    He says that he is working with Carrie Southerland to try to locate family members of Amalia Perez.
     
    devertere and digitective like this.
  9. Roselvr

    Roselvr Ask me how to get your loved one in NamUs

    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    2,836
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sad its taking so long
     
  10. carbuff

    carbuff Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    24,883
    Likes Received:
    34,936
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Couldn't find any new information about this decedent.
     
  11. Otterly

    Otterly Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    93
    There are no rule outs on the UIDs namus page. I guess that means they were unable to find any of Perez's family.
     
  12. carbuff

    carbuff Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    24,883
    Likes Received:
    34,936
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Possibly, though it could just mean that they either never bothered to update Namus or set the information to be seen by LE only.
     
  13. carbuff

    carbuff Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    24,883
    Likes Received:
    34,936
    Trophy Points:
    113
  14. Melt71

    Melt71 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,553
    Likes Received:
    3,294
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Case is no longer on the LA County ME's site though she is still in Namus. I have emailed to check if she has been ID.
     
    Sleuth91, Otterly, Tabirey and 2 others like this.
  15. Melt71

    Melt71 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,553
    Likes Received:
    3,294
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Namus responded today

    - they are unable to compare Amalia Perez MP21198 to this UID.
    - UID only has fingerprints available for comparison. No DNA and no dental (Full dentures).
    - MP 21198 has no fingerprints, no DNA and no dental (full dentures).

    They suggested reaching out to Ms Perez's handling police agency to see if they have any fingerprints available.

    (I assume the finality of the 'no DNA' statements means this UID was probably cremated rather than buried.)

    I will cross-post this information to the thread for Ms Perez CA - CA - Amalia Perez, 78, Los Angeles, 2 January 1991 (websleuths.com)
     
  16. Melt71

    Melt71 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,553
    Likes Received:
    3,294
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My apologies, ‘’twas the ME that responded (not Namus). Should have my morning coffee before sending messages!
     
    Sleuth91, coffeeandacig and faithx like this.

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice