LietKynes
Former Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2011
- Messages
- 10,770
- Reaction score
- 92,084
This was in a past article linked here on this thread... and now I can't find it.
The gist of the article was that the male defendant, BM -- Had "...wrestled control of the children from ..." either JG or the grandparents.
I went back to look for it and cannot find those words in the msm.
But the context seemed to indicate that there was a struggle between BM and the grandparents who had raising him ?
Guessing here that the motive was financial.
Did Noah receive benefits for the condition he was born with ?
The grandparent of Noah, JG's father, said that he didn't think she'd ever harm the boy.
But there was enough evidence discovered by LE to arrest her.
Even if she hadn't harmed Noah, but only watched as BM abused him.... Still guilty as if she'd participated.
The gist of the article was that the male defendant, BM -- Had "...wrestled control of the children from ..." either JG or the grandparents.
I went back to look for it and cannot find those words in the msm.
But the context seemed to indicate that there was a struggle between BM and the grandparents who had raising him ?
Guessing here that the motive was financial.
Did Noah receive benefits for the condition he was born with ?
The grandparent of Noah, JG's father, said that he didn't think she'd ever harm the boy.
But there was enough evidence discovered by LE to arrest her.
Even if she hadn't harmed Noah, but only watched as BM abused him.... Still guilty as if she'd participated.
Last edited: