I've been asking this question for literally years! No cameras between Oville and Caledon? If not, did this person already know the best routes or were there just no cameras?
So, let’s look at men who have access to and the ability to turn off cameras. Have they all been looked at by LE? Or, is the killer LE himself?
I'm thinking that it would take a lot of planning and prep to systematically shut down any cameras along the route. Prior to the murder? I am doubtful, that is a lot of planning and there is a high risk of being seen by passers by. I also don't know how one would go about locating cameras ad then disabling them. Esp cameras belonging to shops, gas stations etc.
I really feel that by now, something should have been done with the DNA.
Thanks dotr…actually I have been a member in the past, just using a new username now. Glad to be back.
Wild guess, maybe whatever DNA might have been retrieved, could be from someone who had legitimate reasons for being in SV's home? speculation, imo.I am wondering about how useful the DNA sample really is. Is there a reason it hasn’t been used to identify the killer? Is the sample tainted or damaged? Is it not being used because the technology is expensive? Could an infusion of funds be all that is needed for the DNA sample to go to the right lab and be used to identify the killer? I read an article about how DNA was used to identify family members of George Washington.
How can old, old, bones, old DNA , be used so easily to identify people, but newer and fresher DNA samples found at Sonia’s home or on her body or in her car, can’t be matched to a single person or their family member in all these large banks of registered DNA samples that exist today? Is it really possible that not a single person in the killer’s lineage has registered for one of those DNA ancestry sites or is it possible that the DNA held by police from Sonia’s case is not a viable sample?George Washington family secrets revealed by DNA from unmarked 19th century graves
Genetic analysis has shed light on a long-standing mystery surrounding the fates of U.S. President George Washington's younger brother Samuel and his kin.www.ctvnews.ca
The thing is that LE mentioned the DNA. IIRC it was referred to as a mixture so I'm thinking maybe it would be difficult to test.I am wondering about how useful the DNA sample really is. Is there a reason it hasn’t been used to identify the killer? Is the sample tainted or damaged? Is it not being used because the technology is expensive? Could an infusion of funds be all that is needed for the DNA sample to go to the right lab and be used to identify the killer? I read an article about how DNA was used to identify family members of George Washington.
How can old, old, bones, old DNA , be used so easily to identify people, but newer and fresher DNA samples found at Sonia’s home or on her body or in her car, can’t be matched to a single person or their family member in all these large banks of registered DNA samples that exist today? Is it really possible that not a single person in the killer’s lineage has registered for one of those DNA ancestry sites or is it possible that the DNA held by police from Sonia’s case is not a viable sample?George Washington family secrets revealed by DNA from unmarked 19th century graves
Genetic analysis has shed light on a long-standing mystery surrounding the fates of U.S. President George Washington's younger brother Samuel and his kin.
