Found Deceased CO - Dylan Nicholas Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 Nov 2012 *father arrested* #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #861
I was wondering the same thing. The CBI worked on this case and helped create the case against MR. So it feels odd that one of their field agents is testifying for the defense.
If they subpoena him, does he have a choice?
 
  • #862
  • #863
I was wondering the same thing. The CBI worked on this case and helped create the case against MR. So it feels odd that one of their field agents is testifying for the defense.
If someone figures out what point defense wants to make using this CSI witness, I'd love to know.
 
  • #864
D: So what happened at impound lot?

W: we drove to impound lot and we formulated game plan for DNA processing---I like to take photos first, before anything else done

Photos being admitted into evidence
1093-1099


D: so after photos taken, then dog did his sniff?

W: yes, if I had seen something like blood, I would have done more before allowing dog to sniff inside

D: did u take notes?

W:Yes

D;Fair to say dog sniff part of search was being filmed?

W:NO, I don't believe so

D: did the dog alert inside?

OBJECTION
P; how does he even know what the dog was doing when?

Judge: the dog and handler are a team--I dont think your witness is qualified to make their observations about what the dog means or doesnt mean

D: judge can I approach bench..SIDEBAR
 
  • #865
If someone figures out what point defense wants to make using this CSI witness, I'd love to know.
I think the defense wants to have him criticise the handlers abilities or expertise during that sniff
 
  • #866
Moran is getting a spanking from judge.
 
  • #867
D: were you told where the dog had a final trained response?

W:Yes, in back seat and bed of the truck

D:eek:ne reason u were enlisted because you were in town and they wanted corroboration

W : yes, we were both looking for evidence

D: you searched where the dog alerted

judge: NOPE NOPE , that is not what we agreed upon, and you are now going against that agreement

D: your honour, I want to make my offer of proof...

J: come back ups here and try again...SIDEBAR
 
  • #868
Finally back. I'll have to watch what I missed later.
 
  • #869
I think the defense wants to have him criticise the handlers abilities or expertise during that sniff
Yep. So far Torres is not going for that.
 
  • #870
Finally back. I'll have to watch what I missed later.
Please do Bravo…it was Mark’s gf from the Dr. Phil show
 
  • #871
  • #872
D; sir what I was asking, you had notes and you could see if it was corroborated

W: no, I dont remember that

P:objection your honour, leading

overruled

D: sir, I am showing you your notes, where u said dog alerted for blood..

D;No mention of alert in the bed of the truck, correct?

Correct

D:You used luminal, correct

Yes

D: did it indicate any blood?

I did see a reaction, initially, but upon retesting, it came back negative
 
  • #873
  • #874
Looks like the defense is using the CBI investigator to show there's no corroboration for the HRD dog alert in the truck. JMO
 
  • #875
Please do Bravo…it was Mark’s gf from the Dr. Phil show
Ohhhh thank you. I seem to miss the good stuff. For lack of better words.
 
  • #876
Looks like the defense is using the CBI investigator to show there's no corroboration for the HRD dog alert in the truck. JMO
His initial test came up positive too because of rust etc....then upon further testing he decided it was not blood...so Molly did her job, and so he did further testing, no harm, no foul
 
  • #877
Your Honor can you please instruct Mr. Moran to use the microphone?!


That’s a quote from me.
 
  • #878
His initial test came up positive too because of rust etc....then upon further testing he decided it was not blood...so Molly did her job, and so he did further testing, no harm, no foul
There was no corroboration. That means the dog alert wasn't verified by scientific means. JMO
 
  • #879
So there was a hair in the bed of the truck, and that might have been what Molly reacted to?
 
  • #880
There was no corroboration. That means the dog alert wasn't verified by scientific means. JMO
But these was an initial POSITIVE in his first test---and it was a reaction to rust...Molly cannot do further testing like the forensic guy can.

But his job is to do so. It shouldn't discredit her initial alerts if she picks up on something that smells like blood
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
99
Guests online
1,697
Total visitors
1,796

Forum statistics

Threads
632,350
Messages
18,625,101
Members
243,099
Latest member
Snoopy7
Back
Top