itsmyworld
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2020
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 281
Wait so that would mean she intended to kill him for a minute. Sorry reply to my own post I didn’t quote. Just an epiphany, she was waiting for him to leave.
I'm not so sure the state would ask for a mistrial if Dr. L testifies and is as weak a witness as so many here think she will be. Why would the state ask for a do-over in that case?I need legalize here...
So if they do not allow her ,it runs a risk of a conviction being over turned ? And if they do allow her it creates a possibility for a mistrial ..because of improper court procedure ? Often the slant is gifted to the defendant on the improper court procedure depending on ...yadda yadda..
Of course not. Was there ever any doubt?No indication that any of them left the home after the candle incident at all. No going outside, no screaming in the street, no driving. Not LS, not Little Sis, not Gannon, not the dogs. None of them.
To me, I think it's unacceptable at any time outside the court's previously established time frame for accepting expert witness reports/evidence, etc. These conversations have to be recorded and reported.
RbbmSo there was no embellishment of the fire at all to get Al to come home. So did she really want him back or did she want to hurt him.
That's what caught my attention when he got on the stand and it was mentioned that he had been in court throughout trial, as it's not generally common practice (I too have testified in court many times and I am simply not allowed to enter the court room prior to my testimony)I was wondering about this too. Has he really been sitting in the courtroom the whole time? I was once a character witness for the defendant in a criminal trial. I had to sit outside the court room for the entire time until I was called and only allowed to sit in the courtroom once I was dismissed as a witness. I thought this was standard, but maybe not.
I need the inner stuffs..I do not think the witness will be that important either..but the dealing with the issue of the improper request and the laws that guide those. Thats kind what I am here for ..like learning new rules and such.I'm not so sure the state would ask for a mistrial if Dr. L testifies and is as weak a witness as so many here think she will be. Why would the state ask for a do-over in that case?
It does seem it would be a pretty big deal to disqualify one of the two defense witnesses.
JMO
I’m sorry yes what? LolYes.
I didn't know:
Maybe in her twisted mind, hurting him would pull him closer to her? Especially with the way she's acting, like this is something they should be bonding over instead of panicking and trying to figure out where Gannon is.So there was no embellishment of the fire at all to get Al to come home. So did she really want him back or did she want to hurt him.
I think T wanted Al to come home and wanted to hurt him. Yes to both.I’m sorry yes what? Lol
Welcome to crazy-making.Maybe in her twisted mind, hurting him would pull him closer to her? Especially with the way she's acting, like this is something they should be bonding over instead of picnicking and trying to figure out where Gannon is.