- Joined
- Oct 4, 2018
- Messages
- 12,093
- Reaction score
- 160,560
I thought I heard it was recovered so I think yes. I will add a disclaimer that I was frantic trying to process the fast moving thread.Is the actual cell phone in the Hans of LE?
I thought I heard it was recovered so I think yes. I will add a disclaimer that I was frantic trying to process the fast moving thread.Is the actual cell phone in the Hans of LE?
To me, it makes sense. If the murder was on Thanksgiving, some time prior to that he would have had to plan. I suspect that they have some type of correspondence that goes back from the date of Thanksgiving and on before that may have led them to the other party.I missed that. Thanks!!
I think the problem might be that PF has been charged with solicitation to commit murder. If evidence relates to testimony from a witness, the prosecution has good reason to worry that PF may attempt to have that witness murdered. Ultimately, PF will have access to all the evidence, full disclosure, but at this time full disclosure may result in endangering someone.
Possibly, if the relationship ever got that far. I just doubt Patrick's sincerity towards any woman. I think he is incapable of love.What if it was a Frazee heirloom engagement ring (like from one of Patrick's grandmothers) and Kelsey wouldn't return it because she wanted the relationship to work?
I’m pretty sure the “possible clue” was just that there were cinnamon rolls left out and not put up. The reporter wouldn’t have any kind of information about a piece of evidence relating to the cinnamon rolls and no one in law enforcement is going to be giving vague hints like that.
ETA: I think the writer was just being creative with their wording. Cinnamon rolls were left out. That’s it.
Haha !Fleeing? Why do you think they were fleeing? They could have been headed to his attorney’s office or the grocery store or a restaurant. I’ve never heard that they refused to say where they were going.
The media is reporting on what the District Attorney said in the press conference. As I understand it, the two first-degree murder counts are a result of evidence that PF premeditated Kelsey's murder, and that he killed her during an attempted robbery which was also premeditated.Right, so I'm not sure where this robbery thing is coming from lol Even his attorney doesn't know what the prosecution has or what they think happened.
I think it's irresponsible of the media to keep saying "attempted robbery" when I didn't hear that in the video from court this morning, and I have not read that in the 2 page document that has been shared here and elsewhere with the list of charges. There is also no robbery or attempted robbery charge listed in the 5.
I just got an idea. Agriculture.
We assume that KB had many job options but was tied up to CO because her child's dad lived there.
The opposite was also true. PF's farm was not thriving. There is a chance that he could have found a better job option somewhere else, could move his mom, too.
But they both, KB and PF, were tied up to CO by being the parents of the kid.
And I suspect - MOO - that they were not engaged any longer. It is possible that the inner anger PF felt towards KB (because you have to be very angry to resort to violent murder) was because "I am good enough to be the father of her child, but not good enough to marry me". At least I hope KB understood something about PF towards the end.
But that was not the reason he killed her. He killed her because KB somehow stood in his way.
It could be equally, her looking for a new job and linked custody issues, or him looking to move but being unable to because of custody.
I just finished listening to the court hearing from this morning, I thought it was interesting wording from the judge, that the lawyer could not discuss the document with his lawyer, they didn't say he couldn't read it. Weird lol I thought the lawyer was going to get it today, but the hearing on Friday would decide if he could discuss it with PF.
Sounds like he could have put it on Craig's list at this rate! Sheesh!
The media is reporting on what the District Attorney said in the press conference. As I understand it, the two first-degree murder counts are a result of evidence that PF premeditated Kelsey's murder, and that he killed her during an attempted robbery which was also premeditated.
I could be wrong. It's been a crazy morning!
MOO
SFB &BBMTrying to catch up on this speedy moving thread! QUOTE]
Trying to catch up on this speedy moving thread! I was thinking about that too. Just imagine being arrested, sitting in jail - no bond, and not being able to see what lead to your charges? Don't get me wrong I think he's guilty but this does concern me.
I read in one of the articles today that he would see it this afternoon. I'll look for it, but meanwhile, there's this one:
Prosecutors file charges against Patrick Frazee in connection with disappearance of Kelsey Berreth
Judge Linda Billings-Vela ruled that Frazee's arrest affidavit will remain unavailable to the public, but the defense will be able to look at it.
And this...
More charges, 6th Amendment debate: Patrick Frazee's court appearance recap
Prosecutors asked for a hold of seven to 10 days before Frazee could see the affidavit, but that matter, along with the motion about the evidence testing, will be discussed at a hearing this coming Friday at 1:30 p.m.
ETA: Here's the one I was looking for.
Kelsey Berreth may have been killed during robbery, Patrick Frazee facing five murder charges | Daily Mail Online
The prosecution also revealed that the arrest warrant in the case must remain sealed, noting that publication of the details could 'seriously jeopardize the physical safety of potential witnesses in this investigation.'
Frazee and his lawyers will see that warrant for the first time on Monday afternoon, and may after that decide to enter a plea in the case.
The reporting is all over the place as usual!
Is it possible the clue could be a drop or two of fluid found on a floor? The chemicals to extract dna would (I guess) erode the sample?
I’m skeptical about clues in the condo because K’s family entered w/o LE, correct?
I believe the defense knows, and has shared with him, what led to the charges.
My understand is that the prosecution wants it publicized at this point.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.