BBMFF (Bolded By Me For Focus):
It is not at all hard for me to imagine in this day and age that there are many, many people who do not understand technology, particularly as it relates to cell phones, pings and tracking data. Not everyone is well-versed in technology, or even uses it that much...there are a lot of Luddites left in the world, myself included.
While it's your opinion that PF was not stupid enough to carry his and KB's two cell phones side by side along w/ him for 2 days,sending text messages from one to the other, that opinion is not borne out by the facts brought into evidence at the pc hearing.
The evidence shows that's precisely what he did; ergo, he is stupid enough to do it.
That's not the posters here saying PF's that stupid.
That's the evidence talking.
Nobody is suggesting that everyone here needs to be 100% sold on the fact that PF did it.
There are just many of us who are, and are going to express that confidence and the reasons for that level of certainty in our own minds.
I have opinions, as do you, as does every other poster here.
Opinions are highly individual, and it's rare for a poster to ever be in complete agreement with another poster on every single point regarding a case.
Varied opinions are wonderful, as is the free and open exchange of ideas.
Once an opinion is voiced, it is open to examination, and scrutiny, and challenge.
That is also an important part of what we do here, as it helps to ensure that opinions are shaped by facts and logic.
I definitely understand that it can be hard not to personalize when someone doesn't agree with your position or thought process about a case.
People here are not "hitting back" when they disagree about an aspect of the case.
They are voicing their own opinions, and hopefully citing facts that support those opinions.
This is one of the most positive, cohesive, respectful threads that I've participated in since I joined WS.
There's a lot of healthy debate here.
JMO.