sun16
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2016
- Messages
- 1,391
- Reaction score
- 12,718
This pisses me off. PF knows what happened. I’ll be back one day when they either find her or arrest him. Or both.Police update
This pisses me off. PF knows what happened. I’ll be back one day when they either find her or arrest him. Or both.Police update
As the last known person to see Kelsey—perhaps even at his own house—PF has and knows critical information that could help LE know what happened to her. Instead, PF is giving everyone the F you middle finger and saying talk to my attorney and get a warrant if you want to TRY and look, dig and figure out what happened. Think about that.
Taking a poll
Where do you think the crime scene is?
(A) Idaho
(B) KB townhouse
(C) PF ranch
(D) Somewhere between B & C
(E) There is not one yet, cause there is no evidence of a crime ... just a missing person
I agree with you. There is no doubt if someone abducted her or harmed her that they would take steps to avoid being detected. That would definitely include advancing a false cover story that would delay the investigation from even starting.If she did meet with foul play, Inmo there is some obstruction of Justice going on here. Based on observations surrounding this case. Anyone who could be involved should worry. The FBI isn't playing tiddly Winks.
Put that together with the fact that she is a mother of a small child, has been described as 'responsible' and in fact has demonstrated that she is 'responsible' by holding down a job with a long commute, has a strong faith, has no history of falling off the grid, and has loving family. Add in her 'fiance' who was the last to see her, but did not bother to report her missing after 10 days, two mysterious texts, but none to her mother, and it all points in one direction. IMHO.Listen, I do think she met with foul play.
But people smack in the middle of vulnerable situations, or experiencing great emotional stress, frequently don’t do things the way “most people” would do them.
If a person is angry or depressed or feeling threatened, for example, the last thing on their mind might be whether they bagged up the last 2 leftover cinnamon rolls.
Instead, let’s try to flip the situation around, in order for her to have left on her own, she would have to have a. access to another form of transportation (ride share, Uber, Lyft, Taxi, train, bus, a friend), b. A duffle bag her brother didn’t know about, c. makeup and a toothbrush other than what her brother found at her house, d. A reason to leave and not tell anyone.
I think it’s possible she could’ve had A-C and, based on public information, we aren’t sure about D.
I think she has met with foul play, probably by a person known to her, but this could still go any number of ways.
They’d have to either find someone else who has relevant info or go after video surrounding the 2 houses and the route to Idaho.I mean how in the world would they know where to search if the last person to see her won't sit down with investigators and answer questions?
MOO
There's a brief video of reporters trying to speak to him as he's getting into a car.We've seen many cases where folks have travelled long distances and were never seen, but most of the time when law enforcement wants to identify somebody traveling a long distance, it is the perpetrator.
It concerns me that he hasn't had his face out there from the beginning, and makes me think that he doesn't want his face seen.
I See that in too many cases here.
I wish that I'm missing persons cases, they would include a photograph of the person that they were last seen with or at least that person would be on the media very quickly to rule them out. He has never done that. I don't even think I've seen his photograph on here except for a couple of times. Does somebody have a photograph and are we allowed to post it?
I’m curious about that. Because what if you have no cell phone service but are connecting through WiFi only? I would assume no ping would register, since it’s not connecting to a tower? And how does LTE network work? For example, last night I turned off my WiFi on my phone, so I was only using LTE for data/internet. My IP search showed me in a different state, 1.5 hours away. Does the LTE server sit that much further away from the cell towers? I wonder if my phone would ping at my actual location, or 1.5 hours away like the IP showed.
Agreed.Right. She supposedly was going to see her grandma, right?, yet none of her relatives were aware of that. Where is the grandma that PF says Kelsey was going to visit? Just call her up and ask, “Did Kelsey say she was coming to see you?” How friggin hard is that?!
I know we cannot sleuth her but I’d love to hear from PF’s mom. Being that he lived with her (I read she’s disabled but no I don’t have a link for that so take it with a grain of salt) and she sometimes took care of the baby? Sorry, not trying to start rumors, please let me know if what I read was rumor if you know.
I’d love to know if she’s been cooperative with LE. Mostly to find out if LE knows if he was out of town during the Gooding phone ping. Would PF’s attorney also tell her not to talk to investigators? I imagine if your son is lawyered up and not talking it may be a given that you’re not supposed to talk either.
I’m just still too stunned that he didn’t report her missing to even consider him innocent at this point. If he was, he would surely expect his baby’s mother to come around for the sake of the baby, who would be missing her and possibly acting out (being fussy, clingy, etc) due to not knowing where her Mama went. I’d think the only reason he wouldn’t want his child to have that familiar security is because he knows Mama is gone for good. You could argue that if she indeed broke up with him on Thanksgiving that he was too peeved or upset to care about where she was if he was innocent...but then again being that peeved or upset also gives him a motive to have disappeared Kelsey.
Personally, IMO and all that, I believe that if she broke up with him that he knew it was for good (no more pussyfooting around the issue that they weren’t moving toward marriage) and likely Kelsey may have indeed told him she was moving back to be near her family and expected to take the baby with her. As we know custody disputes or arguments have often led to the ugliest of crimes.
I just hope the baby is truly safe with him in the meantime since it seems there is no legal way to protect her until more incriminating evidence comes to light. Which I pray to God they can uncover.
(Sorry dude, if you’re perfectly innocent. But you sure look like a duck).
We've seen many cases where folks have travelled long distances and were never seen, but most of the time when law enforcement wants to identify somebody traveling a long distance, it is the perpetrator.
It concerns me that he hasn't had his face out there from the beginning, and makes me think that he doesn't want his face seen.
I See that in too many cases here.
I wish that I'm missing persons cases, they would include a photograph of the person that they were last seen with or at least that person would be on the media very quickly to rule them out. He has never done that. I don't even think I've seen his photograph on here except for a couple of times. Does somebody have a photograph and are we allowed to post it?
I mean how in the world would they know where to search if the last person to see her won't sit down with investigators and answer questions?
MOO
Put that together with the fact that she is a mother of a small child, has been described as 'responsible' and in fact has demonstrated that she is 'responsible' by holding down a job with a long commute, has a strong faith, has no history of falling off the grid, and has loving family. Add in her 'fiance' who was the last to see her, but did not bother to report her missing after 10 days, two mysterious texts, but none to her mother, and it all points in one direction. IMHO.
Me, too. I would love to be wrong about this one.Very compelling
Well summarized
I so pray we do find her unharmed
Remarkable at hiding in public but did PF have a strong online presence? A fraud. I think he's a coward. I hope anyway. Anyone can snap under pressure, sure. He may have threatened to harm the baby if KB ever resurfaced. He holds a lot of cards if so and there's always that small chance she was forced to bolt or had assistance leaving the country. Even if to Canada, not far from her folks or her family in Washington. MOOThere's a brief video of reporters trying to speak to him as he's getting into a car.
He keeps baby turned away from him and also his face is down and also turned away from them.
That's the only time his face was shown as far as media coverage.
He's remarkable at hiding, I have to say.
I agree that this is the most likely direction.Put that together with the fact that she is a mother of a small child, has been described as 'responsible' and in fact has demonstrated that she is 'responsible' by holding down a job with a long commute, has a strong faith, has no history of falling off the grid, and has loving family. Add in her 'fiance' who was the last to see her, but did not bother to report her missing after 10 days, two mysterious texts, but none to her mother, and it all points in one direction. IMHO.