I respect your opinion and will say that mine is subject to change as well. However, with respect to the transitions and the children's possible behavior following the birthday party, being fussy etc., (things that parents deal with on a regular basis), it is not unheard of for a parent's reaction to those kind of things to cause an unintentional death. What I have trouble swallowing in this scenario is that he would go on tyo kill two other people to hide the accident instead of calling 911. Seems unlikely. MOO
What if he suffocated the children with a pillow and then placed Shan'ann's hands on their necks and place his hand and fingers directly on top of hers and squeezed to make the bruises match her fingers. Remember how insistant the defense was on wanting DNA evidence from the neck? I Originally, I thought the crude would destroy that, but it wouldn't have if he had placed their bodies in bags and dropped bag and body in the crude.
Doesn't it seem to anyone else that they would have those data by now? I am surprised that nearly a month later that stuff is being "requested". Does a person charged with so many counts of murder actually have the right to be somewhat politely asked for this? And to say "no" if he wants?
Re your last sentence, in another case the guy did similar to what you mention except killed only one to cover it up, and before he called 911.I respect your opinion and will say that mine is subject to change as well. However, with respect to the transitions and the children's possible behavior following the birthday party, being fussy etc., (things that parents deal with on a regular basis), it is not unheard of for a parent's reaction to those kind of things to cause an unintentional death. What I have trouble swallowing in this scenario is that he would go on tyo kill two other people to hide the accident instead of calling 911. Seems unlikely. MOO
I hear ya. That is a sticky point.I respect your opinion and will say that mine is subject to change as well. However, with respect to the transitions and the children's possible behavior following the birthday party, being fussy etc., (things that parents deal with on a regular basis), it is not unheard of for a parent's reaction to those kind of things to cause an unintentional death. What I have trouble swallowing in this scenario is that he would go on tyo kill two other people to hide the accident instead of calling 911. Seems unlikely. MOO
?
I never said anything about innocence, nor do I think you think he is innocent. You're the one implying.![]()
I agree, if he was innocent of ill intent his behavior would be different. Unless the defense can bring in a psychiatrist with an explanation this will be the last thread in his undoing.
I didn't see formal announcement but our @Mrspratcher is now a WS verified attorney! Thank you for sharing with us!
I believe that was another case, but why is it a big deal? He/she is the prosecuting attorney. The charges they've filed pretty much say the same thing; he's a monster! There is no gag order. Would your opinion be the same if a defense attorney posted CW was a loving husband and great daddy and a saint?Well, pretty big deal if the prosecuting atty is publicly saying the defendant is a monster. IMO
It's happened before. Read the MacDonald case.I respect your opinion and will say that mine is subject to change as well. However, with respect to the transitions and the children's possible behavior following the birthday party, being fussy etc., (things that parents deal with on a regular basis), it is not unheard of for a parent's reaction to those kind of things to cause an unintentional death. What I have trouble swallowing in this scenario is that he would go on to kill two other people to hide the accident instead of calling 911. Seems unlikely. MOO
Believe me -- how I wish it was a psychotic break. However, mental experts have opined that calm, collected, and even joyful media interviews 36-48 hours later do not follow psychotic breaks.I was not implying CW was "innocent of ill intent" in my thought experiment. (I believe my words were : 'Is it possible he was absolutely terrified, as opposed to his actions ONLY pointing to a nefarious coverup that can only point to him having killed all of them.')
I was contemplating whether or not his hiding and cover-up could be attributed to a "psychotic break" of sorts as opposed to proving he himself killed the girls.
Again, I think most of us who are attempting to do some analytical thinking around whether it's even possible CW's version of the truth could be accurate have never implied that CW isn't guilty of murder and coverup. He is. I mean no snarky disrespect- but this is not only obvious, but I find it slightly odd to imply we believe CW is an innocent individual. On the contrary- most of us have repeatedly said we know he is guilty of horrific acts. We are only trying to analyze his version of events.
(EBM to "killed the children" to "girls" for clarity.)
But what else could he say?Maybe I have that wrong, then, how did he open the garage door after saying the key pad was broken? IIRC I remember the discussion about the garage not having a side door, photos were posted. So he was in effect saying that she left for the imaginary play date via the garage door, swung up from the inside? After SHE blocked the front door and the sliding door from opening? Bizarre.
The silence speaks volumes.I wish more people would come forward whom knew CW pre SW.
Ex girlfriends, maybe some ex co workers. Lots of silence![]()