Still Missing CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *arrest* #93

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mysti88c

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
549
Reaction score
2,322
A Chaffee County woman is missing after a neighbor said she went out for a bike ride Sunday and never returned
Chaffee County woman missing since Sunday after neighbor said she went out for bike ride

List of Case Players and Their Relationship to Discussion (Post #440)

————————————-
MEDIA, MAPS & TIMELINE *NO DISCUSSION*
Detailed timeline of events in the Morphew case:
CO - CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee County, 10 May 2020 , MEDIA, MAPS &TIMELINE *NO DISCUSSION*

Arrest Affidavit
—————————————
Suzanne Morphew Case Archive (developed and maintained by WS member AmandaReckonwith)
—————————————
Hearing Notes (Compliments of @NoSI)
Preliminary:
Day 1


————————————-
Suzanne Morphew FB page
Suzanne Morphew Twitter page



Verified Experts/Professionals/Insiders posting in this thread:


10ofRods is a Verified Anthropologist
Angleterre is a Verified LE from England
riolove77 is a Verified Attorney (prosecutor)
Alethea is a Verified Attorney (defense)
otto is a Verified Expert
Chomsky is a Verified Attorney
angelainwi is a Certified Trauma Counselor
gitana1 is a Verified Attorney
Cassidy is a Verified Attorney
lamlawindy is a Verified Attorney (former Prosecutor, now Defence)
NatureLover (Verified friend of the Moorman family)

Thread #41 Thread #42 Thread #43 Thread #44 Thread #45 Thread #46 Thread #47 Thread #48 Thread #49 Thread #50 Thread #51 Thread #52 Thread #53 Thread #54 Thread #55 Thread #56 Thread #57 Thread #58 Thread #59 Thread #60 Thread #61 Thread #62 Thread #63 Thread #64 Thread #65 Thread #66 Thread #67 Thread #68 Thread #69 Thread #70 Thread #71 Thread #72 Thread #73 Thread #74 Thread #75 Thread #76 Thread #77 Thread #78 Thread #79 Thread #80 Thread #81 Thread #82 Thread #83 Thread #84 Thread #85 Thread #86 Thread #87 Thread #88 Thread #89 Thread #90 Thread #91 Thread #92
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please continue discussion here in accordance with The Rules:

Quick rundown of reminders from prior threads:

Rumors are not allowed.

Barry Morphew has been charged with Suzanne's murder and he and his businesses are open to sleuthing.

Do not sleuth or make accusations against anyone who is not an officially named POI/suspect.

If an approved source discusses rumors or family members, it is still NOT allowed to do so at Websleuths. WS has different standards.

Preview your posts to avoid broken quotes.

Lengthy personal anecdotes are off topic. Stay on topic.

Discuss the case and not each other; state your opinion and move one without arguing or bickering.

Random youtube videos or blogs are not allowed unless approval is given by Tricia or Admin.

Approved sources are MSM, LE, Profiling Evil podcast, Lauren Scharf podcast or social media, Investigation Discovery, Crimeonline, Tyson Draper (only the interview with Barry Morphew), public documents.

Do not discuss removed posts or question/challenge moderation on the thread. Doing so is subject to an automatic Time Out.
 
Mod Reminder - Plunder Court Transcript Episodes

The Transcripts from the Preliminary Hearing being shared by Plunder have been approved. This approval only applies to the Plunder episodes specific to the court transcripts. The transcripts shared across the episodes may not be copied and posted in entirety to WS as a single document or post replicating the documents that the content creator purchased.
 
ADMIN REMINDER:

By Websleuths standards the Morphew daughters are victims. Posts trashing them or demeaning them will be removed and members who post in that regard are subject to a loss of posting privileges.

Read The Rules (TOS) and post accordingly.

Thanks.
 
<modsnip: This post has been removed. It is a violation of the law to broadcast this recording.>

ADMIN NOTE:

Thanks to Seattle1, a reminder that Colorado Court has strict policy that court proceedings including WEBEX cannot be filmed/recorded/rebroadcast or face contempt charges.
 
Agree, thank you NothingSurprisesAnymore.

So he phones Suzanne for the 10th time after she hasn't answered his previous 9 calls and the call lasts only 2 seconds.

And then what...? He ends the call after just 2 seconds because she didn't answer immediately, waits a few minutes and calls her for the 11th time?

What's up with that?

"Barry's phone exchanged two messages with "Tim Backhoe" at 1 :49 PM and 1 :50 PM. Barry also made an outgoing call to Suzanne for two seconds at 1 :51 PM (his tenth of eleven consecutive calls to Suzanne). "
 
Last edited:
IMO the plan to murder SM went "final" before Saturday ... likely earlier in the week.

The text messages which point to separation are only an artefact of the real world interactions. It seems clear that SM communicated the finality of her decision. That's when he went final. The weekend was the opportunity to carry out the murder.

I do suspect he murdered her in a rage on saturday afternoon when the plan was for Saturday late evening, but i don't think it was because of any elaborate surveillance. I suspect it was the interactions on Friday PM or Saturday morning he was stewing over.
 
Agree, thank you NothingSurprisesAnymore.

So he phones Suzanne for the 10th time after she hasn't answered his previous 9 calls and the call lasts only 2 seconds.

And then what...? He ends the call after just 2 seconds because she didn't answer immediately, waits a few minutes and calls her for the 11th time?

What's up with that?

"Barry's phone exchanged two messages with "Tim Backhoe" at 1 :49 PM and 1 :50 PM. Barry also made an outgoing call to Suzanne for two seconds at 1 :51 PM (his tenth of eleven consecutive calls to Suzanne). "

If the call only lasted 2 seconds, maybe Suzanne swiped to decline the call?
 
The fact that the charger IS missing is, IMO, evidence that he killed her and dumped the charger because you can very easily buy a new one. He got rid of it to make it look like she took off - without her pocketbook, keys, credit cards, ID etc.

RSBM

It is especially important that we evaluate the entire web of circumstantial evidence together and don't henpeck individual pieces of evidence.

So I agree, the fact that the charger is missing as well as the phone, is important. The question is what inferences to draw? I agree that we need to have regard to the fact that she didn't take money/keys/ID. Here is why ...

The most obvious reason to take the charger, is to charge the phone IMO.

But if SM didn't leave the house ....

IMO the most obvious inference to draw, is someone was interested in what was on that phone.
 
Last edited:
I would be curious to find out from MM2 if the Master Bedroom doorframe was cracked prior to MDW.

IOW, was it cracked before leaving on her camping trip or the last time she was in the home? How long had it been cracked? Was she present when it was cracked? If the crack existed before that weekend and she wasn’t present when it happened, what excuse was given by her parents for it occurring?

Or did she learn about the doorframe crack in the first few days her mother went missing?

MOO
 
IMO since he admitted dumping tranquilizer material he felt he had to produce the gun because who stabs chipmunks?
I'm leaning toward him stabbing Suzanne.

On a previous case I came across some interesting writings looking at what the method of murder says about the killer and the relationship with the victim. In this case we don't have the body, but I think we can discern some very interesting points.

In the Kercher case, you see a level of sadism in the knife play. In the Becky Watt's case, you see overkill, indicating a loss of control (common in first time murders). In McStay a level of brutality and pure ferocious savagery in a beating to death of 4 humans that is difficult to comprehend. Pistorius as a gun murder demonstrating a frightening level of aggression and violence. Watts a deeply personal strangling of the mother and disposal of the children.

In my highly overvalued and unqualified opinion, the use of stupefying drugs represents something quite different to the above examples.

A desire to avoid messy physical violence and instead to have complete, clinical control over the victim. This is reflected in the crime scene. Barely a coffee cup out of place.

For this reason I think he definitely used the 22.

He wanted to take care of business. A messy fight wasn't the plan.

.02
 
I wonder if there is any good reason to think that BM may have had someone to help with the planning? Some of this seems a little too clever for just BM. IMO

I am not sure it is clever for him though?

He knows all about tranq-ing deer, therefore he has that in his toolbag. Throw the body down a mineshaft? Not rocket science.

Everyone knows these days that their phone gives away location. He knows his Truck is tracked because he gets all his journeys in his phone app.

I think his staging is actually quite poor, apart from overpowering SM, which lets face it, was the easy part.
 
I've always had the feeling that Barry caught her in the act of taking selfies of herself in her bikini (or w/o it on) and when he saw her doing that, he knew damn well those photos were not getting sent to him, which would have threw him into a (murderous) rage. Didn't he park the truck away from the house so that he could sneak up on her? If that's true though, had he already pre-planned on murdering her that specific afternoon/night, and seeing Suzanne having fun taking seductive selfies was just an added "straw" that broke the mountain lion's back?
Well, if she was taking selfies then the cloud will have them.
 
I’m not that familiar with the texts. Did Suzanne often use “wanna” instead of “want to?” That looks like Barry-text to me.
This.
Also
“Get hot tub stuff”
I REALLY hope LE have spent a lot of time checking Suzanne’s friends and families text messages for familiar turns of phrase, grammar etc. These could be so revealing.
 
And BM said he was SM's "ATM" and I have no doubt he is the ATM for others as well. JMO (quoted from last thread)

Each time I see something written along this vein I become rankled. It speaks to dominance and misogyny on so many levels and only an un-enlightened man-boy would think it is an okay thing to brag about. I wonder how it made Suzanne feel, each time she heard it? I doubt it was grateful.

Perhaps it became an inside joke within their family unit? Who knows?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
156
Guests online
4,247
Total visitors
4,403

Forum statistics

Threads
592,406
Messages
17,968,493
Members
228,767
Latest member
Mona Lisa
Back
Top