I am surprised how many want to portray this calculating, methodical murderer as so incapacitated by psychosis he could never leave the home and even was locked in the basement of his home like some hideous monster, by his mother. Come on.
I totally agree that being locked in the basement is really far fetched, and I agree that he was calculated and methodical.
But I also fully believe his brain was different. I just don't assume they are going to find evidence of it in a dead brain, I think it would have been pretty clear on scans. Because I don't think something was structurally wrong, per se. Just functionally. Although structure is possible, I suppose. And environment/experience
can effect brain function so I'm not even saying it was completely biological.
I think he saw himself as exceedingly superior to the rest of mankind, and I think he saw other humans as inanimate. I think that his brain scans would have shown marked differences in related areas.
The reason I think this is important to study, is that I fully believe one day we will find a definitive science. Definitive science can lead definitive methods of altering brain function. Which is absolutely possible in our amazing malleable brains. I've mentioned before, so I'm going to put it in quotes so people who aren't interested in off topic banter can easily skip it
I have a child who has profoundly gifted IQ, but has/had an under-active left occipital temporal region. Among other things, this region processes the voice (not language, but sounds) of others. Child demonstrated excessive understanding of physics and mechanics, was extremely agile, but was also severely lost in their own world. Presented much like a deaf child with no visual language. Nearly non-verbal, didn't attempt to communicate needs- sought them out independently instead. At 10 couldn't read, at 13 reads for pleasure. Now the child is not only verbal, but expressive and interactive. Participates in a mainstream classroom with good grades. Still socially independent, but not socially incapable. It's not some miracle, we targeted games and activities that would stimulate that left occipital temporal region. Among other things, "Fast ForWord" is one such commercial program designed to stimulate this region for kids. A lot of schools are using it routinely with students with lower reading scores, and it works!
It is a fact that we have had this dialogue since the monster in the bell tower cut down all those innocent lives. Yet all our panicked attempts to discover "why" has not led us any closer to preventing something like this.
I think we are far closer than we were then. Because we are beginning to understand the implications of different brain function, we are beginning to head into an era where we can stimulate underactive brain regions, and calm overactive brain regions through specific games and activities. If we understand the under and over active areas in the brain of mass murderers, in coming years we may be able to see that combination on a socially withdrawing 8 year old and start games and activities to balance brain function before the symptoms themselves cause a further degeneration of function. The single biggest problem we are having with this specific area of this science, is that the majority kill themselves, and then it's too late to see their brain scans. I hope Holmes is made to submit to scientific study as part of his sentence, but still- that's just ONE.
And that doesn't even approach the ethical issues of "fine tuning" an entire society.
The above is also just one area of research, there is also a lot of gene research (MAO-A, hyped the warrior gene) and chemical research as well. Al may have had increased dopamine, but I don't know that it was debilitatingly so. I know some who have a strong interesting in chemical research who are considering a high endorphin (pain tolerance) which led to a disinhibition of dopamine.
The one thing, however, that logic tells us may prevent at least some of these massacres- refusing to glorify the murderer by naming him, plastering his photos everywhere, reciting his life story and calling him the macho sounding "gunman" or "killer" - we steadfastly refuse to do, as a society. I just don't get that.
I do agree with this. I think the results and findings should be quietly published, but only the victims faces and names should be plastered on our screens and websites. I know we can't legally inhibit the media, but I would love if public opinion could come around to this place- as the media is essentially providing what they think we as a society want.