nodamselindistress
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2020
- Messages
- 1,909
- Reaction score
- 21,553
Judge has ruled, why is JS arguing still?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He just can’t stop!Judge has ruled, why is JS arguing still?
For his appeal. Burden of this error is on Defence imo. He didn't act in a timely fashion and which he is defending for the record. Own goal and serious error by Defence IMO. MOOJudge has ruled, why is JS arguing still?
Yep, total BUST....Wouldn’t you say….today isn’t starting out well for JS
He sounds frantic. Again, I smell much aggression from certain Trocs and am extremely wary of the protectiveness of FD by defense counsel. I may be projecting (as usual, LOL), but I wonder if Trocs are somehow beholden... or at least loyal to the Dulos family and FD's Greek friend contingent. Both are more "honor cultures" than American; the urge to maintain appearances despite wrongdoing is very strong. I come from one. All MOO.He just can’t stop!
I have noticed the protectiveness if the Dulos name by the defendant’s family, too. I did wonder if Rena Dulos has something on MT and what she has done.He sounds frantic. Again, I smell much aggression from certain Trocs and am extremely wary of the protectiveness of FD by defense counsel. I may be projecting (as usual, LOL), but I wonder if Trocs are somehow beholden to the Dulos family and FD's Greek friend contingent. Both are more "honor cultures" than American; the urge to maintain appearances despite wrongdoing is very strong. I come from one. All MOO.
Yep, its a real risk to lose the jury here and he knows it. It simply makes me angry to see deliberate ploys to get to mistrial. Judge R knows what is going on and also is letting State put on their case the way they see fit as is proper. The craziness about this all is that because Defence has acted the way he has now for 4 years that he essentially FORCED the State to proceed with their case in the manner that we are sadly witnessing as otherwise he would make a whole series of claims as to why information or witnesses were not produced.MOO
JS's objections often rally around threats to drag the trial out even longer. Such a carer of the jury's time. When he's the one drawing out every single day!
Nope I don't think you are projecting at all. I think you are simply using your knowledge from experience to very astutely describe what might be going on in this case with as you describe with 'honour cultures' and so you see things in a way that perhaps those folks from other cultures simply aren't attuned to seeing in the behaviour of folks. I happen to agree with you as to your assessment of both Greek and Venezuelan cultures btw and think you are spot on in your assessment.He sounds frantic. Again, I smell much aggression from certain Trocs and am extremely wary of the protectiveness of FD by defense counsel. I may be projecting (as usual, LOL), but I wonder if Trocs are somehow beholden... or at least loyal to the Dulos family and FD's Greek friend contingent. Both are more "honor cultures" than American; the urge to maintain appearances despite wrongdoing is very strong. I come from one. All MOO.
Can’t wait for the ME!State's witnesses today, one LEO, two lay witnesses and the ME
Yes, wonderful film. Lumet and Newman were a fantastic combo too! MOOFor some reason I am today reminded of the wonderful scene with Paul Newman (as Frank Galvin, Esq.) in Sydney Lumet’s The Verdict. When counsel Galvin objects to being overruled: he states ‘Objection’, the judge/court makes note, and Galvin then indicates ‘Exception’….. and the court acknowledges ‘Noted and thank you’ or the like. PS: IMO a wonderful movie to watch some time.) MOO