Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #29

Discussion in 'Missing Persons Discussion' started by doodles1211, May 26, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. doodles1211

    doodles1211 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,375
    Likes Received:
    23,414
    Trophy Points:
    113
    New Canaan Police are looking for a missing woman Saturday, May 25.

    Jennifer Dulos, 50, was reported missing around 7:30 p.m. Friday, May 24. A sliver alert has been issued.

    New Canaan Police with the assistance of the Connecticut State Police initiated a search and an investigation both of which are ongoing as of 8:45 am. Saturday..

    Anyone with information related to Dulos’s whereabouts should contact Sgt. Joseph Farenga at 203-505-1332.

    [​IMG]

    New Canaan Police search for missing woman

    Media thread:
    CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, Media, Maps, Timeline *NO DISCUSSION*

    Thread #1
    Thread #2
    Thread #3
    Thread #4
    Thread #5
    Thread #6
    Thread #7
    Thread #8
    Thread #9

    Thread #10
    Thread #11
    Thread #12
    Thread #13

    Thread #14

    Thread #15 Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 #15 *ARRESTS*
    Thread #16 - Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #16
    Thread #17 :Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #17
    Thread #18 - Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #18
    Thread #19 - Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #19
    Thread #20 - Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #20
    Thread #21 - Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #21
    Thread #22 - Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #22
    Thread #23 - Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #23
    Thread #24 - Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #24
    Thread #25 - Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #25
    Thread #26 - Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #26
    Thread #27 - Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #27
    Thread #28 - Silver Alert - CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #28
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 8, 2019


  2. Sillybilly

    Sillybilly Administrator Staff Member Administrator Moderator

    Messages:
    25,604
    Likes Received:
    50,312
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ADMIN NOTE:

    Was reviewing this thread for another reason and stumbled across the rudeness, personalizing, and bullying of another member in this thread. This is absolutely unacceptable.

    Everyone has a right to their opinion as long as it is stated respectfully (which it has been). To be chastised for holding a different or minority opinion is just plain wrong. If everyone agreed, there would be no need for "discussion".

    If you have a concern about another member's post, use the Report feature rather than resorting to snarky comments and tag-teaming against that member.

    Thank you.
     
    MilanaCapricorn likes this.
  3. Midwestmom2019

    Midwestmom2019 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,104
    Likes Received:
    17,905
    Trophy Points:
    113
    After skimming a thousand posts, it’s SSDD yet again.
    Sad state of affairs.
    I’m learning patience. But hurry up bc I don’t want to have to keep learning the same stuff every different day!!!!!
     
  4. Morgan10028

    Morgan10028 Justice for Jennifer

    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    2,178
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Keep in mind how heavily redacted the depo transcripts are, which is very clear when you look at the page numbers and how they jump around (in addition to the amount of space blanked out on what was published). As @pandaknows mentioned earlier...and something I had not thought of...Weinstein knew to ask the question about the cars! That alone gives me A LOT of faith that GF's side IS in fact doing a lot of investigating on their end. I really don't think that FD would've offered up anything about the cars had Weinstein not asked. I think Weinstein is all Pit Bull, IMO. But the kind of Pit Bull who can play with children and not cause harm to others, though still have the innate protective instincts of the breed. MOO
     
  5. Midwestmom2019

    Midwestmom2019 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,104
    Likes Received:
    17,905
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I love Pitties. Thank you for your perfect description of them.
     
  6. Morgan10028

    Morgan10028 Justice for Jennifer

    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    2,178
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Awww, thanks! I imagine that I'm not the only one who reported the Greek articles, though LE's quick action on MT's insta and then the widespread coverage on the Greek interviews encourages me, and hopefully encourages us all to report to LE, SA Colangelo, and Judge Blawie. You just never know what might be important, so when in doubt, JUST DO IT! :)
     
    Kori17, Traymar, MollyDDD and 22 others like this.
  7. Morgan10028

    Morgan10028 Justice for Jennifer

    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    2,178
    Trophy Points:
    93
    So far, 10/16/19 is the running date. Does anyone else think that there's a correlation between Colangelo turning over the discovery in court on 10/4/19 and the search warrants being unsealed? It was just a feeling that this might be the "heads-up" to the attorneys of what is in those sealed docs (both MT and FD's attorneys left with similar 'discovery' packets). MOO
     
    Fizzlemisty, Laughing, NoSI and 16 others like this.
  8. Morgan10028

    Morgan10028 Justice for Jennifer

    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    2,178
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I had not gotten through a good portion of this thread when I replied, and I completely agree with your comments! I also think FD would take the chance...he can once again claim that he wasn't in Greece when the car was prepared and didn't know that it was packed with cash, diamonds, what have you...if found.

    Also, someone made mention of the weight of the vehicles being transported and while I think it's a fair thought, I also think it's unlikely to be a factor when shipping. There are too many after-market accessories that can be added to cars ie. rims, exhaust, etc that could/would add to the original weight of a vehicle. It's unlikely that customs would inspect the vehicle to a degree that would determine the original weight and then verify the after market accessory weights with those manufacturers. Afterall, the point of air shipment is speed and the brokers handling these shipments know that a premium was paid for the sole purpose of getting the goods quickly. An extensive inspection of each vehicle would take a considerable amount of time that totally defeats the purpose of an air shipment.
     
    Fizzlemisty, Laughing, tmar and 15 others like this.
  9. Jmoose

    Jmoose Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,803
    Likes Received:
    30,147
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is in response to Outforjustice’s post re: why a jury trial was requested by Atty Bowman for MT:
    I was wondering this myself, and just assumed that it was because the law may be clear on it, and a bench trial would convict her. That is my understanding of why you’d choose a jury trial. Usually in a high profile case where the public finds you loathsome, you would choose a bench trial, though. Maybe they’re planning to compromise one of the jurors? I can’t see Bowman being on board with that, though. They are only doing this because they think they have a better shot at an acquittal, but I can’t think why.
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2019
  10. DetectiveFoyleWannabe

    DetectiveFoyleWannabe Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    252
    Likes Received:
    3,868
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I think it’s because the case is weak on its merits so they hope to get a sympathetic or gullible juror or jurors (see, for example, OJ jury) who they could sway with BS and condition at trial. Also most attorneys would request jury since it’s a constitutional right. Could waive at a later date but to do this early would probably be malpractice IMO.
     
  11. Tink56

    Tink56 MOO...IMO

    Messages:
    2,138
    Likes Received:
    18,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    AB may have asked for a jury trial to indicate that MT is either done cooperating or she feels she has given LE everything she knows. As far as she is concerned she is "innocent" of hindering and tampering. And, she feels she has been as honest as she can be....(without further throwing her boyfriend further under the bus). Flashback to the only time AB spoke after a hearing...the second arrest warrant...he said, "she should be presumed innocent...and she is."

    Sadly, I think she may recant her statements about the events of May 24 and her statement about JD's body in the Tacoma. The pressure of the state might be strong, but FD and NP has been publicly sending clear signals to her in the press about her "true" testimony at trial. In June NP wanted the charges against her dropped...he claimed she had passed a lie detector test...he has claimed he wanted to have her join FD and him in fighting the state's charges. Both NP and FD have sending messages to her in their short press conferences after hearings and in the media.

    The above is where I don't understand why the gag order hasn't been implemented to a greater degree. Is MT a co-defendant or a potential witness in the possible murder charge or both?
     
  12. pernickety

    pernickety Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    477
    Likes Received:
    5,714
    Trophy Points:
    93
    This is in reply to those who wonder about the Pattis grievance hearing. It did occur and I've heard that the Chief Disciplinary Counsel charged NP with several violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including RPC 8.4, subsection that deals with criminal act (2)? RPC can be found on jud.CT.gov. Click "Public" then "Rules" The grievance process is drawn out. A subcommittee hearing has then to go to full Statewide Grievance Cmte, etc. See CT General Statutes 51.90g(d), 51.90h(d). Also see SGC's own rules (some of which differ from CGS) Then an attorney is not usually suspended or reprimanded before the CDC files a case in the Superior Court. See jud.ct.gov, civil case look-up, party name - "Chief Disciplinary Counsel" An audio of the 10/3 hearing can be purchased (I think for about $20), from the court reporters. See SGC rules re hearings. This is one to watch. NP has had grievances filed against him in the past, but they've been squelched by the powers that be. He actually wrote about going before the Federal Grievance Committee, in an article in the CT Law Tribune entitled, "Let My Experience Be a Wake-up Call." Search CLT website--will show the start of the article, but it's now archived. One can either pay Lexis for it or seek out the hard copy from the printed edition at a CT law library.
     
  13. afitzy

    afitzy STAY HOME, SAVE LIVES!

    Messages:
    8,428
    Likes Received:
    91,672
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've been thinking about the no contact order and how or even IF the State is monitoring the situation.

    IMO its really tough to monitor social media. It appears that Judge Blawie IS monitoring the bracelet issue but is he/State being equally vigilant about social media and other 'contact' as defined in the order? I'm not sure but I am concerned. Does Atty. B even know if MT is in compliance with no contact? Ditto for Atty. P? My guess is they are following the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy but this is just a guess on my part!

    Why not have the 2 charged individuals, MT and FD, each time they come to court sign off on their compliance on the No Contact Order? Given the 2 individuals we are talking about here I have no doubt that either/both would have any issue signing their name to a document and then continuing to violate the No Contact order but at least there will be a process for LE to track back on to impose penalties once all the violations are uncovered.

    I am curious though how MT ever believed that FD following her Patagonia Styles Insta wouldn't be discovered? Is Patagonia Styles a bona fide going concern or is simply a sham to move money around? I wonder how many such Patagonia Styles rugs has FD or FORE or even the Greek family purchased vs. how many 'rugs' have actually shipped? Perfect vehicle to get money from Pt A to Pt B IMO and hope LE is all over it.

    Funny thing about trust in people and lying. Once you see someone lie as an ongoing way of living, IMO its virtually impossible to backtrack and give the person the benefit of the doubt. We saw FD lie on and ongoing basis in Family Court and to such an extent that the Judge called him out on it and put it into the court record. We have seen MT lie to LE for over 3 months and IMO its unlikely she is doing anything differently today. We sadly have 2 morally and ethically challenged individuals that have been charged with serious crimes and they way they operate its virtually impossible to believe anything that either one of them might ever say.

    Sad situation IMO.

    MOO
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2019
  14. afitzy

    afitzy STAY HOME, SAVE LIVES!

    Messages:
    8,428
    Likes Received:
    91,672
    Trophy Points:
    113
    @pernickety, thanks so much for this update. I think this search was above my pay grade. But now that you explained how you did the search it will be possible to continue to follow up.

    The allegation against Atty. P I believe related to filing a false affidavit in the Jones case and so perhaps this is simply a bridge too far, even in the land of CT Judiciary which on a good day looks like the 'wild wild west'! I do wonder if this is why Atty. P wasn't in court the other day with FD?

    I will never forget Atty. P going 'tit for tat' in a very rude manner with Judge Blawie and Atty. P making the statement that he 'gambles with his law license' every day! Perhaps Atty. P threw the dice and gambled one too many times and that this time there will be consequences for his inability to self regulate his behaviour and decision making process! I for one hope so!

    MOO
     
  15. Chicago54

    Chicago54 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    416
    Likes Received:
    4,542
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Do you happen to know if defense attorneys were allowed to see those sealed warrants?
    If they were not, why would Colangelo give them info almost two weeks in advance of unsealing? Do you know if that would be in violation of the seal? I’m ignorant of the law here, but I could see Colangelo using info to pressure MT...
    I did find this article at the time the warrants were sealed, but it states they are unclear whether or not records were sealed to defense.
    Search warrants remain sealed in Jennifer Dulos case
     
  16. MsJosie

    MsJosie Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,200
    Likes Received:
    13,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is one difference between atty P. going before board then and now. Before atty P. was only known to lawyers and law (more locally) and could slide by for whatever reason, but now the world, and world media know of him, his actions/antics/mis truths etc. This is not just because of the FD murder case but it appears IRS regulations/laws and international laws may have been violated. People are watching more closely. He may get another slap on the wrist, he may not because everyone is watching him....people are going to ask and are asking why he is so special. I hope he is gets what he deserves if the evidence shows he did wrong which IMO he did. What a baffoon.
     
  17. afitzy

    afitzy STAY HOME, SAVE LIVES!

    Messages:
    8,428
    Likes Received:
    91,672
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Its an interesting question. The way the seal was described was that nobody had access to the warrant info until the seal was broken. Perhaps you are right that the discovery materials given to the defence teams this week will allow them to 'back into' some of the warrant info but my guess is that whatever was given by the State was strategic and didn't jeopardise the ongoing investigation. Pure speculation about all this on my part! MOO
     
  18. pandaknows

    pandaknows Justice for Jennifer

    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    2,184
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Pure posturing. MT believes in herself. Go ahead, make my day. MOO.
     
    kimpage, Seattle1, CTGrammy and 16 others like this.
  19. afitzy

    afitzy STAY HOME, SAVE LIVES!

    Messages:
    8,428
    Likes Received:
    91,672
    Trophy Points:
    113
    HaHa! I think I'm going to 'steal' your fantastic line and put it in the bottom of my posts, "Go ahead, make my day! MOO". Thanks for a good laugh and putting this all into perspective! MOO
     
  20. afitzy

    afitzy STAY HOME, SAVE LIVES!

    Messages:
    8,428
    Likes Received:
    91,672
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Duplicate. DBM.
     
    Tink56 likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice