HopeForTheBest
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2019
- Messages
- 2,259
- Reaction score
- 21,473
That takes manual labor and effort. IMO, it's not how our boy rolls.
You’re right, I’m sure!!! MOO!
That takes manual labor and effort. IMO, it's not how our boy rolls.
Very possible. As I recall this was after the fact. Why would he take that risk in broad daylight, in the back of his house? Doesn't make sense. MOO.It's not a theory that works for me either (digging by hand to bury her), though one never knows with him.
However, needing to dig to hide something small - like a phone, ring, tooth, something that he had originally intended to keep of hers, and then changed his mind once LE were all over him, OR something of HIS (weapon, bank records?) he needed to hide because it connected him to that or another crime - now, that's another story.
Weinstein subpoenaed his records in the SummerSorry to quote myself but David Markowitz, Esquire, is a witness for the plaintiff - is that odd?
Thank you. That's going to be extremely interesting.Weinstein subpoenaed his records in the Summer
He’s been fighting it
FD would use telescoping hard cases. He's not dumb and those wold take years to decompose. MOO btw I don't see a laughing point regarding this tragedy and the whereabouts of her remains. JMOWouldn’t it be great if FD put her remains in a water skiing tote, filled it with rocks to weight it down bc he was worried that her decaying body gases could move the bag up? And in the Spring, as you note, bc all kinds of rocks show up with the movement of the earth, the tote and rocks move up with shifting ground soil. Hahahaha.
You reading this, FD?
FD would use telescoping hard cases. He's not dumb and those wold take years to decompose. MOO btw I don't see a laughing point regarding this tragedy and the whereabouts of her remains. JMO
Example: Hard Travel Case - Black
Where was it said he was looking at sport catalogs I must have missed it.Laughing at FD. His ill conceived plan. And Mother Nature cooperating to bring out her body.
Edited to add wasn’t he looking at some sports catalogue for new travel cases? Seems to me JD took the kid’s skiing stuff with her.
Maybe not...
Weinstein subpoenaed his records in the Summer
He’s been fighting it
Aydrianna523 YOU HAVE IT! Kudos!Wow. I didn't know how much info there was in this case.
I figured out who MT is. Her atty is Bowman?
I figured out who FD is. He lived at 4jx in Farmington, Hartford Cty with MT. His lawyers are Murray and Pattis.
He has a business ForeGroup, same locale. His worker (PG) let FD use his truck the day of JD's disappearance.
Foregroup has property for sale:
4Jx and Mtn Springs in Farmington. And...
Sturbridge in New Canaan. A neighbor heard loud banging there at 5am.
JD, the deceased, is GF's daughter. Her location was New Canaan.
GF lives in NYC Her lawyer is Weinstein.
There's a bunch of other lawyers and judges, as well, one being Noble. Yikes. Lots to remember.
Next to see GHughes video. I'm determined to try to figure this out.
I'd have to go back through the motions again but my recollection was that there was an order from the Judge that Atty Markowitz had to get the files to Atty Weinstein. As I haven't seen a followup motion from Atty Weinstin on Atty Markowitz, I've been assuming that compliance did in fact occur and that the files by some miracle of GOD were found and delivered to Atty Markowitz. Maybe my assumption was incorrect, IDK. But it looks like Atty Markowitz will be a witness at the trial.Does this mean Markowitz still hasn’t produced the records? Can he defy the demand to show up in court? Can we assume that there’ll be no consequences if he doesn’t show up?
Sorry to quote myself but David Markowitz, Esquire, is a witness for the plaintiff - is that odd?
Where was it said he was looking at sport catalogs I must have missed it.
According to some quick google research it takes 1 man with a helper 4-5 hours to dig a 6' grave and cadaver dogs can smell up to 15' below the surface.
I just can't decide whether his original intent was to move her to a predetermined location or leave her be discovered at the site of the attack.
I have always wondered about this. Almost seems too good to be true, IMO.
It's not a theory that works for me either (digging by hand to bury her), though one never knows with him.
However, needing to dig to hide something small - like a phone, ring, tooth, something that he had originally intended to keep of hers, and then changed his mind once LE were all over him, OR something of HIS (weapon, bank records?) he needed to hide because it connected him to that or another crime - now, that's another story.
He’d burn bank records. Even foreign accounts. Although I doubt he ever kept them close by.
Remember JD talking about FD getting a gun recently? She wrote that into an affidavit for Judge Heller.
Where’s the gun? Surely LE knew about it but I don’t recall a gun being on the list of items taken from the house. I suppose they inventoried everything back at the station. I wonder if it was ever shot?
I remember long discussion about this. I thought we mostly reached agreement that the Porsche seats were put into the front and that the back seat was a jump seat. But, I believe the seats were always referred to in the plural. IIRC.Regarding the EE 2001 Toyota Tacoma referenced in AW2 here is a link to specs for vehicle. IDK if EE had the 4x4 or 4x2 model but we do know he had the extended cab due to the FD request to 'swap out the rear seat' using FD Porsche Cayenne seat. I am still not seeing how the Porsche seats fits into the 'door and a 1/2' version of the Tacoma and I wonder if EE had the 4 door version instead?
Here is a photo of the 4x4 version with 1.5 doors:
View attachment 216501
https://www.cars.com/research/toyota-tacoma-2001/specs/usb10tot092a0/