Jmoose
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2009
- Messages
- 6,862
- Reaction score
- 51,948
Well, JS is still trying to get Mt’s case moved to a more JS-friendly location (Hartford). He was successful in getting the ankle monitor removed, and I am afraid that he will be successful again in getting this moved before a judge that he knows personally. I really doubt that he is doing this because it is jurisdictionally (sp?) correct, and don’t believe for a minute that he is doing it so that his travel time is less; he wants a friendly judge and jury. He’s made two new motions, pushing her trial back even farther-he is the one who is taking her right to a speedy trial away.