If my memory serves me right..."afitzy" (aka "amazing afitzy") posted this at the beginning of all of our websleuthing journey together. Maybe the summer of 2019?
"According to the Brown classmate, “It was big and grand and it was old New York and that’s the way Hill [Jennifer’s late father] was. [He] had a big, generous personality and the wedding reflected that.”
"According to the family source, Jennifer’s “family didn’t really know what to make of Fotis.”
NEWS AND NOTES - Brown Class of 2002
Haha! I do recall posting that ages and ages ago. We have been at this a good long while haven't we my friend!
Brown is a small place and I do find it curious that nobody from that time ever stood up to talk about FD at any point so far as I know.
It seems that FD good friend from that period whose last name was Marsiello iirc really might have been the only person from that period of college who remained a friend. But this is just speculation. I do hope LE looked into the Marsiello connection and loans etc. as there seemed to be alot of money going back and forth and my recollection was that Marsiello went through a contentious divorce around the same times as Dulos v. Dulos was happening.
My recollection is that the FD personal situation really did change once JF father became ill and later passed away as he no longer had anyone looking over his shoulder at FORE. I think the traveling to FL stepped up, drug use might have amped up too and FD took trips without JF more often than not too (Civil Court testimony put these trips on the timeline with FD and MT as early as 2015). Could also be that the Dulos marriage hit the rocks around the same time that JF father passed away? IDK, just speculation.
Just a question as I'm curious what people think. I do wonder why FT just didn't keep MT hidden in the 123 Hunter property in West Hartford and keep the marriage with JF going? Or, perhaps this wasn't even relevant because the Dulos marriage most likely had been on the rocks for awhile in advance of MT affair by all accounts and JF pulled the plug on the marriage and left with the children? I still don't know. We heard LA say on the stand that JF found out about the MT affair in 2017 iirc but I think that was the case in part because MT came to Farmington with her daughter and was supposedly humiliating JF with the local crowd which was obviously upsetting to her. IDK.
I did a bit of a stroll on social media yesterday and was literally stopped in my tracks by the Troconis Crew on their "facts Insta" claiming that FD asked JF for the separation/divorce and as "proof" for this they illegally imo posted documents from the sealed FC documents of FD motion. The Troconis Crew DID not post the JF motion which I believe was substantiated by the LA testimony in this criminal case (as well as the Civil Case and in FC - so on the record testimony to refute the FD divorce timing claims exist in 3 CT Courts I believe) against MT. I guess my question is to anyone that cares to answer because I cannot figure it out: How does it benefit MT for the Troconis Crew to post on social media that FD sought to divorce JF when the timeline and facts of the Family Court timeline DO NOT SUPPORT THAT STATEMENT? Shorter version of question: Why would the Troconis Crew choose to lie about the facts and timing of the Dulos separation/divorce and WHY NOW?
Colour me quite confused.
That statement about who asked for the divorce was in addition to a classic video by TP stating that the, "Troconis Family was told by FD in 2016 iirc that he was involved with an amicable divorce". This was another head scratcher for me as while we know FD was not a well known truth teller (ditto for MT who imo would choose the lie when truth is in her best interest always), this particular lie repeated by the "Baghdad Bob" of this tragedy was interesting as it seemed to that FD was talking about the 'amicable divorce with JF in advance of JF finding out about the affair and asking for divorce".
But, my bigger question is why would the Troconic Crew at this late date want to rewrite history to make it seem that their belief was that FD expected to sail through the divorce and custody process with JF and that the Troconis Crew would next be planning the BIG WHITE WEDDING for their dear daughter MT?
Its always interesting to see people try to rewrite history but I admit to being absolutely baffled by this narrative based on repeating lies of FD told years ago (really no different from repeating the lies of the infamous Dr Herman report that MT and all the Troconis Crew seem to believe is true - its not btw!).
Is this silly PR social media campaign being undertaken by the Troconis Crew because somehow it makes what MT did in terms of having affair with married father of 5 who wasn't even separated at the time it started, somehow less despicable? It also baffles me even more as imo MT doesn't recognise shame as a deterrent for any behaviour and I don't think her family really do either? Why do what they are doing on social media?
I am quite a simple minded person and simply do not understand these PR related machinations from the Troconis Crew. If anyone can school me on what all is going on this this revisionist history being put out on social media I would appreciate it greatly as I simply don't get it. Thank you in advance!
MOO