Silver Alert CT- Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
kaen said:
I wonder if the 11pm arrest was strategic. Since the hearings wouldn't happen until Monday, it meant that the GF would have to spend the weekend in jail and get a taste of the life she might have if convicted. And, hopefully getting her to talk. If it is true that she did not eat during the weekend, she might just want to cut a deal so she can be a mother and have her freedom.
Click to expand...

It wouldn't be the first time LE would have picked someone up on a warrant just before a weekend (or holiday weekend) for those (and I'm sure other) reasons as well.
 
Fotis Dulos, girlfriend held on high bond as FBI searches Waveny in Jennifer Dulos case
UPDATE: 10:30 AM

The FBI Evidence Recovery Team is concentrating its search in a wooded area of Waveny Park along the Merritt Parkway. Some FBI members are also on the Merritt searching the shoulder area.


UPDATE 10:15 AM

The FBI Evidence Recovery Team was seen placing orange evidence markers in the woods of Waveny Park near Lapham Road and the Merritt Parkway bridge.
 
afitzy said:
Will do some 'research' on this judge and her case history and report back if anything interesting is found. To me it sounds like the judge wanted this to be a nice and easy shared custody arrangement and it was as if the entire relationship history and multiple contempt of court actions by the STBX never happened. Reading some of these rulings is truly like taking a step into the TWILIGHT ZONE! Judges like this one seem to just be pushing paper across their desks with little to no consideration of the children and the former spouse. Pathetic IMO. MOO completely! I've now read over 150 documents and the entire file is filled with information being presented and rulings like this one.
Click to expand...

My clients feel the same way at times. But from the judge's perspective they have endless, non-stop cases where people make up the most outlandish things about one another and/or are caught lying or violating orders.

But they don't end in murder.

In pretty much every state the standard is the best interests of the children and most states believe that frequent and continuous access to both parents is best.

So the end goal is always time with a parent even if that parent is troubled.

Here, this guy was granted supervised visitation. That's highly restrictive in the world of family law. Someone has to essentially babysit him and follow him during all his time with the kids.

And he was not granted overnights.

Eventually those restrictions would probably be lifted though if he demonstrated that he was calming down or had taken an anger management course or something.

It's frustrating because sometimes these parents really damage the kids. But the parental reltaitonhsip and parental rights are sacrosanct.

That's why I'm the dependency court system reunification is the end goal even in cases like little Maleah Davis, who kept showing up at the hospital with suspicious "injuries" and we all know how that turned out.

But the fact is that in 99.9999% of family law cases, no one ends up dead.

Of course that doesn't factor in the emotional dmaage to kids from an angry, crazy parent but I guess they figure the emotional damage from not seeing a parent would be worse.

I will say that in the majority of cases parents acting out after separation and during the pendency of the case seem to calm down once the divorce action has concluded. And judges know that.

It's a hard thing to deal with for these judges who have nothing but crazy cases - one after another - and no real way to fix the parents. And no real way to tell which one will actually become that nightmare realized with a dead spouse or dead or physically damaged or kidnapped kids.
 
Alkali13 said:
Is that a yes? lol :)
Click to expand...

Is it relevant?

Since you have no tweet to link, paraphrase the reporter name with "I think I saw __but it was deleted moments later."

Fox61 reporter Carmen Chau did this late Saturday afternoon with tweet about the couple arrested, deleting tweet minutes later. Although it proved true later that night, she took much heat for it! (I think she was told off record by a source and accidentally tweeted). MOO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Staff online

Members online

... and 185 more.
Total: 4,502 (members: 186, guests: 4,316)

Online statistics

Members online
186
Guests online
4,316
Total visitors
4,502
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
592,463
Messages
17,969,337
Members
228,774
Latest member
truecrime-hazeleyes
Back
Top