Trino
Well-Known Member
Is there a legal way to go after Lacy?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's her feeble attempt:
"Here's what I was doing with the exoneration letter," Lacy explained. "I was trying to prevent a horrible travesty of justice. I was scared to death that despite the fact that there was no evidence, no psychopathy and no motive, the case was a train going down the track and the Ramseys were tied to that track."
No, lady. You made a travesty of justice WORSE. "No evidence?" Jim Kolar GAVE you the evidence, and you ignored him! "No psychopathy?" It was there if you knew to LOOK for it. I hope you BURN.
Is there a legal way to go after Lacy?
This does bring the odd story about the butt print in Foreign Faction to light. I often wondered what it was doing there. I could just imagine investigator Forrest Gump. "I saw a buttox print on the floor. I wonder about that. It must have been from an intruder."
Hahahaha!Just when you thought this case couldn't show more incompetancy...... a "butt print?" Has Mary Lacy ever mentioned this before? Are there photos or a cast impression?
Did other investigators get chills when noting this incredibly powerful piece of evidence pointing to an intruder? /snark
Just nuts and surreal.
Lol!Line up at the door folks! Gotta test everyone's butts!
Is there a legal way to go after Lacy?
I'm ASStounded at the facts she even graduated with honors. HOW?
Can you imagine someone being dragged into court over a butt print? It would turn into another, "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit."
"Well sir he ate one too many DingDongs so now there's no way to tell"
I'm ASStounded at the facts she even graduated with honors. HOW?
Can you imagine someone being dragged into court over a butt print? It would turn into another, "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit."
"Well sir he ate one too many DingDongs so now there's no way to tell"
Which would be stupider, convincing yourself a butt print you see in the carpet is a smoking gun, or making up a ridiculous story about a butt print thinking it will convince other people?As I was packing up my computer and projector, she told me about something that Tom Wickman had purportedly observed during the execution of the search warrants at the Ramsey home. He reportedly had observed the impression of someones buttocks in the carpet of the hallway outside JonBenéts second floor bedroom. It appeared that someone had been sitting on the floor with their knees up around their chest, leaning against the wall / cabinets. Wickman purportedly told her that he thought it was where the intruder had been waiting while the family was at the White dinner party. I was aware that some intruder theorists believed it possible the perpetrator had entered the home while the family was away that evening, and that he had written the ransom note while awaiting their return. Apparently, Lacy thought that Wickman was suggesting the intruder had found some time to sit on the floor outside JonBenéts bedroom after penning his note. I didnt recall seeing anything like that in any of the police reports I had read and subsequently asked Wickman about it. He told me he had no idea what I was talking about.
respectfully snipped....Which would be stupider, convincing yourself a butt print you see in the carpet is a smoking gun, or making up a ridiculous story about a butt print thinking it will convince other people?
Thank you Charlie Brennan for delivering the goods yet again with this new article about Mary Lacy's "tell-tale butt print." I'm dying! This is the final nail in Lacy's coffin, I mean how incompetent can you get! What a pathetic and asinine attempt to assure the public that her friends didn't commit the crimes they obviously committed. Lacy's credibility wrt the Ramsey case has hit an all-time low in the public eye and it's never recovering - hopefully this will prevent future documentaries and news reports on the case from quoting her useless exoneration letter. Brennan's article is as much about how terribly she failed this case as it is about the new DNA findings, it was so satisfying to read. And also to know that she's in hiding somewhere refusing to comment. The least she could do is answer for herself. And not that bs about the poor, defenseless Ramseys being "tied to the track." As the article points out, there was no "train" headed towards the Ramseys in 2008, just the very inconvenient end of her term looming. Her time to pin the murder on anyone-but-a-Ramsey was running out, and that was the best she could come up with.
So without the dubious DNA all Mary Lacy has left to offer is a freakin' butt print. But did she even see it? She definitely said so to ABC: "We all saw it." But in Kolar's book, it doesn't actually say she saw it first hand, just that she heard from another person that a butt print was seen. And that person didn't even remember seeing it.
Which would be stupider, convincing yourself a butt print you see in the carpet is a smoking gun, or making up a ridiculous story about a butt print thinking it will convince other people?
That was fantastic. I bet JR was thanking his lucky stars that he already made his "final interview" when he got that call from the Daily Camera! Very convenient for him. JR must be the only parent of a murder victim who responds to a new development in his daughter's case with, "I think we have said all that can be said and I need to get back to my job!" I'm glad that in contrast to nearly everyone who's been involved with or followed the case, John Ramsey is able to close the book on that child's murder and walk away without another word. But after all, this is the guy who was wanting to hop a plane within half an hour of finding his daughter's body because, according to the police report, he had business in Atlanta. Like the grand jury indictment reveal, this is "just more drama" for Mr. Ramsey.I'm ashamed to admit this, PL, but I felt really good reading the parts where LW and JR were squirming. And it's gonna be even more fun watching them get ROASTED if they don't drop these new lawsuits. Is anyone ELSE reminded of Napoleon attacking Russia?
You don't think that Lacy is going through hell? Lacy was just publically crushed by an investigative team and a former Colorado Governor. Her defense is a butt print. If she had any reputation, it's just been demolished. I don't think there's any legal way to go after her, but she'll be forever linked to this case. There' s no place to hide. All she can do is keep her head down and hope that people will forget. Of course, there is Kansas--some place where she's 200 miles away from any town in all directions. South Korea's also a good choice, but they'll have the Olympics in 2018 so they'll be too many reporters.
Ex-DA Opens Up About Why She Cleared the Ramsey Family of JonBenet's Murder
AND there is no picture of this mythical butt print that was supposed to be a smoking gun?Thank you Charlie Brennan for delivering the goods yet again with this new article about Mary Lacy's "tell-tale butt print." I'm dying! This is the final nail in Lacy's coffin, I mean how incompetent can you get! What a pathetic and asinine attempt to assure the public that her friends didn't commit the crimes they obviously committed. Lacy's credibility wrt the Ramsey case has hit an all-time low in the public eye and it's never recovering - hopefully this will prevent future documentaries and news reports on the case from quoting her useless exoneration letter. Brennan's article is as much about how terribly she failed this case as it is about the new DNA findings, it was so satisfying to read. And also to know that she's in hiding somewhere refusing to comment. The least she could do is answer for herself. And not that bs about the poor, defenseless Ramseys being "tied to the track." As the article points out, there was no "train" headed towards the Ramseys in 2008, just the very inconvenient end of her term looming. Her time to pin the murder on anyone-but-a-Ramsey was running out, and that was the best she could come up with.
So without the dubious DNA all Mary Lacy has left to offer is a freakin' butt print. But did she even see it? She definitely said so to ABC: "We all saw it." But in Kolar's book, it doesn't actually say she saw it first hand, just that she heard from another person that a butt print was seen. And that person didn't even remember seeing it.
Which would be stupider, convincing yourself a butt print you see in the carpet is a smoking gun, or making up a ridiculous story about a butt print thinking it will convince other people?
AND there is no picture of this mythical butt print that was supposed to be a smoking gun?
I think it's the stupidest "smoking gun" I've ever heard honestly. She should be embarrassed of herself and should have to answer for it. I wonder what LW will use now since his main bragging point was that ML exonerated the Ramsey's with DNA. I think more people are beginning to hide in their showers now. The truth is coming out.
Justice for JonBenet!!!!
It floors me too!So, not only did ML "clear" the Rs based on tDNA, she "cleared" them, in her mind, based on buttprints? Honestly, her habit of dismissing any evidence that pointed to the family sounds like denial to me. Denial that any normal-looking family (and rich family) could be capable of this. Denial that people involved in an investigation should not possess.
In Kolar's book, Kolar states ML said she, "didn’t want to harm her relationship with the Ramsey family." This family's influence over her and many others is unbelievable. I wouldn't be surprised to learn she is a distant cousin of the family, actually.