GUILTY Denmark - Kim Wall, 30, Copenhagen, 10 Aug 2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,101
I wonder if it was his wife who testified behind closed doors on Friday? Apparently PM wasn't in the courtroom during this witness's evidence, instead he was moved a separate room and watched the proceedings via a special screen.

One of Friday's witnesses cancelled.

This makes me think that they are afraid to give evidence because they might have been threatened. PM's snuff movie/dark web contacts perhaps?


I never thought about that, but it is highly likely it is his (ex)wife.

I am sure people of the press know who she is, but they have shielded her - thankfully.
I have no idea who she is, no one I know ever talked about her.
 
  • #1,102
PM´s fantasy about his perfect death - according to the female witness yesterday:

Naked women and cats with him in some sort of tube. Someone turning the tube so it would slowly rotate, which would make it impossible to fall asleep.
He would eventually die from lack of sleep.

Is that weird, or what???
Any thoughts on this?

It sounds to me like he resents his own need to sleep, he would like to experience what it's like to never be interrupted by tiredness. Perhaps he had tried to avoid sleeping, but never succeeded.

In his testimony, he claims he fell asleep after Kim died. Had he been awake for days? A person can do crazy things if they don't get sleep.
 
  • #1,103
And/or the rocket.
The rocket IS a tube, only with room for one though.

Everything in his life seems to center around tubes.
I think I said earlier in the thread: a phallus and a womb in one.
Oh god- and the tubes he used to weigh down Kim's remains.
 
  • #1,104
The ladder was no doubt vertical and he would have needed both hands to hold onto it, so he couldn’t carry or drag her up using his hands at all. Ropes would have been his best option, however trying to drag a dead weight up would have been difficult. If he dismembered her to lighten the load, why did he have to decapitate her? We’re not talking about the weight of a couple of bowling balls. Later he said he felt “sad” that the sub had sunk. What!!! When he got ashore he wasn’t distressed or emotional. However he was ”sad” about the submarine sinking.

He sounds like a psychopath to me:

Lack of remorse, shame or guilt
- sees others as targets and opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims.

Shallow emotions
- remaining unmoved and cold by what would move a normal person.

Callousness/Lack of Empathy

Need for stimulation
– living on the edge, verbal outbursts, promiscuity.

Promiscuous Sexual Behaviour/Infidelity
- sexual acting out of all sorts.


A friendly reminder that there was no need at all to carry or drag the body of KW out of the submarine. Alerting the Rescue Services would have been enough.

But if one insists .... tie her with some straps and a belt to the ladder, get up the ladder yourself and lift the ladder out of the submarine.
 
  • #1,105
  • #1,106
The discovery of all body parts of Wall is important for family and relatives, says the Swedish detective Johan Esbjörnsson, who participated in the search at sea together with his dog Ben. But they are also essential in the forthcoming trial, which will begin on 8*March. "As is often the case: no body, no case," says Esbjörnsson. "These pieces of the puzzle are necessary in order to convict the perpetrator. (report dates from January 16 2018.)

https://nos.nl/artikel/2212242-puzz...gen-deense-uitvinder-kan-nu-echt-starten.html

Transcript of Dutch subtitles in video with interview of Johan Esbjörnsson and Ben:


xxl.jpg


This is Ben, employed by the Swedish police. He specializes in finding bodies in water. Ben can sniff drowned bodies from this boat. He was employed in the Danish submarine case.

Journalist Kim Wall boarded the submarine for her work. She did not return.

"We were called by the Danish police because we have water cadaver dogs They wanted to find the parts of the body that had disappeared. The torso had washed ashore by itself. The remaining parts were missing. They asked if we could track those parts in the sea. I thought: how will that work? It seemed impossible. We had never worked at sea before and we had never searched so deep. We mainly work in lakes and rivers. But the Danes knew where the submarine had sailed, so we could focus on that stretch of sea."

"Even now, when the dog is lying here, he constantly records smells. So they have to be able to cope with a lot. For example, if we pass by a scent and we sail away from the scent again, then the dog has lost its scent. Then we come from another side in order to establish an area. So we interrupt the dog all the time. He has to start over and over again. So it takes a lot of effort from these dogs."

Ben and the detective took their boat to sea. Looking for five body parts. That proved to be very disappointing.

"When we left in the morning it was quiet weather but then the wind suddenly started to blow hard. Then we had waves of two, three metres. At the places in the sea where Ben gave a signal .... the divers went looking."

"The dogs managed to find the scent of the remains in the sea and the divers went after it... but they did not find any body part. Dog Ben was taken back to the sea ... to repeat the smell tests. We found out that the current was much stronger than assumed. We contacted an oceanologist specialising in sea and currents. He said we should look a kilometre further, he thought we would find something there. When the divers did that, they found all the remaining body parts."

"You are not happy because it is such a tragic matter. But I was very relieved. The dogs were right. And now the matter can come to an end. It was possible to find all the pieces of the puzzle so that a trial can be held... and the perpetrator can be convicted."

"Now I click, he has clearly indicated the smell. Then he gets his toy ball. On the way back he is allowed to sit on my lap. So that he knows he has done well."
- He needs to be pampered a little?
"Yes, then he gets some extra attention."
- Was that also the case at sea?
"Yes, that is how we did it there."


BBM


Madsen obviously gambled that the remains would never be found, and that might have worked out if it hadn't been for Ben and Johan. Maybe his preference for women and 'kittens' had something tot do with him not paying attention to what certain dogs are capable of.


:yesss:
 
  • #1,107
OK, o/t, but I am officially in love ... with Ben!!!

Sent from my N9132 using Tapatalk
 
  • #1,108
Thank you, ZaZara for that great article.

Those dogs are amazing - and that whole team. Such a fantastic job they all did.
I just wish the dogs knew what an important find they made. The case wouldn´t be where it is if it was not for them. Kim Wall´s family would not have a whole body to bury.


Yeah, hahaha, PM probably always hated dogs and hates them even more now!

Maybe his punishment should be death from lack of sleep in a tube with dressed men and dogs.
 
  • #1,109
OK, o/t, but I am officially in love ... with Ben!!!

Sent from my N9132 using Tapatalk
Ben, his owner and the divers deserve medals.
 
  • #1,110
Thank you, ZaZara for that great article.

Those dogs are amazing - and that whole team. Such a fantastic job they all did.
I just wish the dogs knew what an important find they made. The case wouldn´t be where it is if it was not for them. Kim Wall´s family would not have a whole body to bury.


Yeah, hahaha, PM probably always hated dogs and hates them even more now!

Maybe his punishment should be death from lack of sleep in a tube with dressed men and dogs.

Not in a tube but in a square dog kennel.
 
  • #1,111
Not in a tube but in a square dog kennel.

Yeah, I was too generous with the tube! :laughing:

I just wish they had gotten around to sending his sorry a** into space in his "tube", and the whole thing had blown up. I have thought that a million times since the murder of Kim Wall.
 
  • #1,112
  • #1,113
A friendly reminder that there was no need at all to carry or drag the body of KW out of the submarine. Alerting the Rescue Services would have been enough.
BBM
But if one insists .... tie her with some straps and a belt to the ladder, get up the ladder yourself and lift the ladder out of the submarine.


Very true - we do need to keep reminding ourselves of this huge, mad and glaring incriminating feature of PM's story.
His explanation, if I recall correctly, has been that he went into a psychotic state on finding Kim Wall dead, and so became obsessed with getting her body out of the Nautilus. (Was this part of the evidence he gave on 8 March? I haven't located it again.)
 
  • #1,114
Here's an article from the Danish newspaper Berlingske Tidene about the work done by the Swedish search dogs helping to find Kim Walls body: https://www.b.dk/nationalt/svenske-lighunde-opsporede-kim-walls-hoved The dogs (and their sense of smell) are fantastic.

While we are all marvelling at the work of those water cadaver-dogs - here's an earlier post (last autumn, when the body parts were found) with a link to an article. Google translate does its usual strange things, not translating 'lig' for body and saying Per Lindqvist is a percussionist rather than a dog handler (kriminal hund defoerer?) but it's readable.
 
  • #1,115
A friendly reminder that there was no need at all to carry or drag the body of KW out of the submarine. Alerting the Rescue Services would have been enough.

But if one insists .... tie her with some straps and a belt to the ladder, get up the ladder yourself and lift the ladder out of the submarine.

If you murdered someone, you wouldn't be alerting anyone.

If her body was intact, I believe she would have been too heavy for him to pull up that distance, let alone if she was tied to the ladder. I was under the impression that he wasn't a well-built man who would have that amount of strength.
 
  • #1,116
If you murdered someone, you wouldn't be alerting anyone.
...RSBM
.

Well, that's the point, isn't it?
I know the defence is going for the 'only guilty of improper disposing of a body' line but there must come a point where that is so bizarre and the circumstances so indicative of guilt that even without all the other circumstantial evidence building up, it is evidence of guilt by itself. I have no idea what the case law in Denmark is on this, of course.

Another quite different point - I was interested to see the comment that in Denmark the defendant does not swear an oath and in fact it was said somewhere 'does not have to tell the truth'. Is that just a recognition of reality - that in countries where they do swear an oath to tell the truth, defendants still lie? What's the position about witnesses? Does anyone know?
 
  • #1,117
Well, that's the point, isn't it?
I know the defence is going for the 'only guilty of improper disposing of a body' line but there must come a point where that is so bizarre and the circumstances so indicative of guilt that even without all the other circumstantial evidence building up, it is evidence of guilt by itself. I have no idea what the case law in Denmark is on this, of course.

Another quite different point - I was interested to see the comment that in Denmark the defendant does not swear an oath and in fact it was said somewhere 'does not have to tell the truth'. Is that just a recognition of reality - that in countries where they do swear an oath to tell the truth, defendants still lie? What's the position about witnesses? Does anyone know?

There is an article about that here where a long time defense-lawyer is telling us how it is:
https://translate.google.com/transl...glerne-maa-peter-madsen-lyve-i-retten/7071607

Such are the rules: Must Peter Madsen lie in court?
In Danish law enforcement, an accused - contrary witness - must lie as much as he or she wants
When Peter Madsen takes place again in the middle of courtroom 60 and has to continue his explanation on 21 March, according to Danish law, he is not required to tell the truth the truth.

This explains Attorney Mette Grith Stage, who herself has been defender in a number of major criminal cases.

According to Mette Grith Stage, from a defense attorney's perspective, it is a two-edged sword that an accused does not have to tell the truth.
- A prosecutor often says in his procedure. "Unlike all the witnesses, the accused may lie." Understand that he will do that too. It's a bit tacky, because an accused does not have the opportunity to say 'I want to renounce the right not to tell the truth', says Mette Grith Stage.

- So it's not entirely true to use this against an accused.

"Basically, the accused must lie because you can not claim a charge that he or she should sit and indicate himself," said the defense attorney, supported by the Associate Professor and PhD. in law at the University of Copenhagen Trine Baumbach.
 
  • #1,118
If you murdered someone, you wouldn't be alerting anyone.

If her body was intact, I believe she would have been too heavy for him to pull up that distance, let alone if she was tied to the ladder. I was under the impression that he wasn't a well-built man who would have that amount of strength.

I was under the impression that this all happened after she allegedly died of CO poisoning? That no murder was committed, it was all an accident and he suffered a psychotic episode for the time it took to cut the body in pieces.

IMHO cutting up the body had nothing to do with it being too heavy. This was a) all about the fun and b) to prevent that the body parts were ever found. I bet he knew all about the currents.

The submarine had been rented out for stag parties various times. This suggests that he would have had at least some hands-on experience with removing drunken revellers off board, even those who had passed out. Even if he had help with those, he would have remembered this when he made his plan.

Peter Madsen met with Kim Wall before he offered her to sail with him that night. She wasn't aware of it, but she came to audition for the part, and got it. IMHO he would not have made the offer if she had been 160 kgs instead of 60.
 
  • #1,119
I'm probably about the same build as PM. Some of the 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 I've dragged up and stored in my loft would be heavier than Kim. Admittedly, I haven't dragged any dead bodies up there, but it really would have taken more time and effort to dismember.

The dismemberment may have been for the concealment of evidence, or something else, but it wasn't for convenience.
 
  • #1,120
There is an article about that here where a long time defense-lawyer is telling us how it is:
https://translate.google.com/transl...glerne-maa-peter-madsen-lyve-i-retten/7071607


L_I, is the translation right when it says 'must'? Shouldn't it be 'is allowed to'?

It does say 'may' in another place, which is better. So the law is, you can't expect a defendant to tell the truth if it will incriminate them. I suppose that follows from a dishonest plea of Not Guilty, really.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
55
Guests online
1,993
Total visitors
2,048

Forum statistics

Threads
632,383
Messages
18,625,493
Members
243,125
Latest member
JosBay
Back
Top