Or the judge simply screwed up a slam dunk case with the most laughable judgement I have seen since Hellmann/Knox
Her judgement has been so criticised I think because so many people expected or perhaps hoped for a different outcome. She didn't make many mistakes imo. She said they came to a unanimous decision based on all the evidence and explained about her reasoning for the key evidence. You can't really have expected the court to have found that Oscar knew it was Reeva once the heads of argument were in? Seriously, on what basis could she have rejected Oscar's account if the screams evidence didn't support the State's case and more than that, it did support Oscar's account. So it wasn't just that the State didn't do enough to prove their case, they actually went a very long way to 'proving' Oscar's.