I moved to a new condo this past May and I spent several weeks prior to my move in date visiting several apartment/condo communities. While visiting - I was required to fill out a "visitor form." The sales person would then either record my dl # and/or make a copy of it.
There were also plenty of moments for me to look around while the salesperson would look at her computer screen for availability/pricing as well as gathering pamphlet information for me to take home.
My point in the matter is this - There was enough time for KC to let her eyes roam on the salesperson's desk just during the the initial conversation. Let's see - the salesperson would want to be congenial about the fact that KC could not view the apartment because she did not bring her license (let's remember every new rental for these folks is their bread and butter). So, I am sure that he/she offered KC a beverage and ask her to be comfortable while he/she took Tony to view the apartment. KC being left alone had ample time to gather the information about any visitor card that may be in view. We have all seen the visitor card information in the document drop and know there is enough detailed information for KC to be able to create her "nanny."
JMO ..... =)
She was very good with that phone..........a quick snap of a picture with her phone and she would have ALL the information she needed.
She was very good with that phone..........a quick snap of a picture with her phone and she would have ALL the information she needed.
I don't think LE even has to tell the dispatcher or whoever does it why they want it. I remember years ago, my then sis-in-law could run tag #'s on whoever she wanted, I know because once she utilized this service for me.
But why use somebody as a scapegoat that you know doesn't live there and then deny that she's the ZG ? Then there's the fact that ZG was there the day after Caylee was last seen so if she was thinking about it then, why didn't she start dropping ZG's name instead of continuing to us Zani ?
This case drives me crazy!!! A very short trip.
Maybe she was hoping ZG would take the apartment?
She was very good with that phone..........a quick snap of a picture with her phone and she would have ALL the information she needed.
This is also true for the state of FL. My Dad is a D/S in Miami-Dade and he told me this is the case for the whole state. I asked him once to run a plate for me and get me the owner's name and he couldn't unless he had reason. Bummer.
IIRC, in an interview, ZG was asked how she thought KC had gotten her name and info. ZG stated that she thinks KC got the info from her Sawgrass form because she only filled out the name of her youngest two children on the form even though she also has two older children which she didn't list on the apartment form.
While Casey may have asked a friendly LE guy to look up a tag number, it seems she must have gotten at least some of the ZG info from the apartment form (youngest children's names). Also, I wouldn't think driver's license info would include children's names.
Maybe she was hoping ZG would take the apartment?
http://www.wftv.com/video/17580338/index.html (approximately 3:35 on the tape)
Okay, I just re-watched the interview with ZG and her attorney. He stated she has 6 children and only the nicknames of her two youngest were on the Sawgrass form. The theory of ZG and the attorney is that LE and KC got her children's names (nicknames) from the apartment form.
Please note I do not remember if we have another source/interview where KC actually gave the nicknames of ZG's two children to LE. If no one else can confirm this info, then it is possible that only LE knew the nicknames of ZG's two youngest children and LE got the nicknames from the form.
i think this is very plausible...yet the fact that she mentioned 'zanni' to people way before this event is just baffling. she couldn't have just lucked out at the time and found someone she could logically call zanni...could she???
this case makes my head, heart, and soul hurt sometimes.:banghead: