Well that stinks. I like it when jurors ask questions.
And thanks for the time!
When I used to try cases we hated it when the jury was allowed to ask questions for our own cases, but we loved it when watching somebody else try a case because you can learn a great deal about how a jury is receiving testimony by the questions they pose. However, most trial lawyers are ultra-control freaks and will design their direct examination for a given witness very precisely in order to elicit specific information. If your witness survives your opponent's cross-examination reasonably intact, the last thing you want is a stray question from a juror that upends your preparation or raises new questions after you've finished your questions.
In Katie's last trial I felt some of the juror questions were very good. I'm disappointed we won't have that to look forward to this time.
For what it's worth, here are some things on my mind as we wait for the trial to start:
1) If Garcia truly takes the stand I will turn off my phone, close the shades and lock myself in front of the computer. His testimony and cross-examination will have huge implications for Charlie's case.
2) I'm going to be very disappointed if the State does not do a much better job dealing with Katie's finances and her supposed "work" for the Adelsons. I thought Ms. Cappleman's cross on both counts could have been much stronger. I wonder whether she truly believed KM would not take the stand. Certainly, most pundits and experienced trial watchers were shocked when she did testify. Perhaps Georgia's preparation wasn't as thorough as it could have been if she thought there was no chance the defendant would testify. I would bet money she doesn't get a second chance this time. Hopefully, she has done her homework on these points.
3) Of course, I'm biased because we do so much forensic visualization ourselves, but I hope the prosecution does a much better job with their demonstrative exhibits this time. Fundamentally, a trial lawyer has to tell a story -- one the jury becomes invested in, believes and feels an emotional connection to. Ms. Cappleman is a very smart attorney, but she (like most trial lawyers) does not have the gifts wielded by Clarence Darrow, Gerry Spence, Johnny Cochran, or Beth Wilkinson. Having several key visuals to anchor the presentation would really help.
4) The new Dolce Vita recording will be huge if it is presented properly. The judge isn't allowing the use of a transcript, so it will be important to present portions of the recording cogently and carefully so the jury doesn't tune out or become overwhelmed with trying to discern what is being said.