GRT
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2020
- Messages
- 3,624
- Reaction score
- 28,951
The core elements of E's theft claim seem very strange- He leaves 6K worth of fishing tackle unsecured in a modest home under construction, the gear is stolen and he makes no insurance claim.
I suspect that even prior to the incident, "E" gave different people different spins regarding how much of fishing gear was purportedly stolen- and whom he suspected of stealing it.
In the wake of the enormity of the defendants actions, "E" has since further spun his even indirect involvement down to that of "shocked, horrified- and in no way involved."
This has included going philosophical regarding what it means to truly converse with somebody and what it means to truly discuss a particular subject. ( whether he had any conversations with McMichael senior and what was discussed).
In the end, what E said and to whom he said it seems pretty murky and spun several times.
JMOO, The fishing gear would not be a covered loss because it was personal property. Once, we had a generator, nail guns, and a jobsite radio stolen, but our agent told us the radio wasn't covered, even though it had been purchased so the crew could listen to music as they framed. It even ran on the same cordless DeWalt batteries the tools ran on, but no....they excluded it.
English was probably covered by a contractor's risk policy, which wouldn't cover anything other than construction materials and tools.