Germany/Portugal - Christian Brueckner, 27 @ time of 1st crime (2004), charged with sexual assault crimes, Praia de Rocha, Portugal. #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #481
From 2020.

This week.

In addition, a senior public prosecutor is to be questioned as a witness because an undercover investigator is said to have been smuggled into the Wolfenbüttel correctional facility (JVA) . The court must decide on the requests for evidence.

 
Last edited:
  • #482
“He claimed the female officer, who he named as ‘Rebecca Vogt’, had been asked to put recording equipment in his cell without a court order”.
So, Rebecca Vogt will be testifying for the defense?
Fülscher did not mention the names of the BKA investigators mentioned in the e-mail. A piquant fact: several Federal Criminal Police Office officers involved in the case are to be heard as witnesses in the course of the proceedings.
Also it was reported 46 witness, seems a slight exaggeration.

After reading the charges, Brückner's team of defense lawyers requested that three more witnesses be invited to the 40 that had been scheduled so far.​

 
Last edited:
  • #483

A former BKA employee is making serious allegations in the case of the suspect who allegedly killed Maddie McCann. This could jeopardise the trial against him.

It is a motion with explosive force. One that nobody expected to hear this Friday in the courtroom of the district court in Braunschweig. A former employee of the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) claims that the suspect's custody cells in the Maddie McCann case were equipped with bugging technology. She is said to have told Christian B.'s lawyers this and also provided photos to prove it. The lawyers therefore requested this morning that the witness be heard in the trial.

During the alleged wiretapping measures, telephone conversations between the alleged murderer Christian B. and his lawyers could apparently also have been tapped. In the motion, they therefore question whether it is even possible to conduct a trial in accordance with the rule of law.

The trial was adjourned on Friday following the arraignment and the lawyers' motion.

The former BKA employee is said to have sent an email to defence lawyer Friedrich Fülscher. In it, she wrote that she had been responsible for wiretapping measures in the BKA's "Operativtechnik Audio (OE33-3)" department. In this function, she had been involved in preparations for the installation of bugging technology in Christian B.'s cell. According to the application, two BKA officers had told her that they had a personal score to settle with Christian B. and that she was therefore sure that they were up to something.

The fact that the witness actually worked for the BKA can be seen from an employer's reference, which is said to be attached to the application. It describes her work at the BKA as she stated.

Were there bugging measures?

Maddie McCann, an almost four-year-old British girl, disappeared without a trace from a holiday flat in Praia da Luz, Portugal, in 2007 and has been missing ever since. The German Christian B., who lived there at the time, is considered the main suspect. So far, however, there is no concrete evidence of a crime. Christian B. is on trial at Braunschweig District Court for five other offences that he allegedly committed in Portugal between December 2000 and June 2017. The charges relate to alleged rape and sexual abuse. B. has already been sentenced to seven years in prison in one trial, but a retrial is currently underway.

In order to obtain information about the offences he is accused of, the BKA officers apparently resorted to wiretapping. The application filed by B.'s lawyers also includes photos showing parts of the wiretapping equipment.

Additional cables can be seen leading away from the telephone socket in the cell. B.'s lawyer writes that the images originate from a chat between the witness and the BKA officers. They had had questions for the witness and had therefore sent the pictures to her.

One of Christian B.'s lawyers, Philipp Marquort from Kiel, is shocked by the police's actions: "The defence still has no knowledge of this process, apart from the information from the witness." He finds it adventurous that such important information is not disclosed to the court, "but also to the defence by the public prosecutor's office". He believes his client's fundamental rights have been violated. "We cannot yet say whether the surveillance was legal or illegal. However, the client only spoke to his defence lawyers on the phone. Monitoring the defence lawyers' conversations is illegal."

But how credible is the witness? According to B.'s lawyers, she showed them her work certificate. According to this, she had always shown great commitment and identified with her tasks.

The reference was signed by a head of unit at the BKA, and a BKA stamp was also said to be on it.
 
  • #484
Sounds as if the judges are going to be busy investigating the validity of these claims
 
  • #485
Why is Rebecca former BKA?
 
  • #486
Why is Rebecca former BKA?
JC is claiming this is who it is, FF made no reference to a name.As to being an ex employee, people move on for any amount of reasons.
 
Last edited:
  • #487
JC is claiming this is who it is, FF made no reference to a name.As to being an ex employee, people move on for any amount of reasons.
Really, I was wondering what her motivation for contacting FF -rather than anyone else - was? Axe to grind against her former team or management, rather than a genuine worry about a miscarriage of justice? Or has FF found out from someone else and persuaded her to email him?
For me currently (whose opinion does not affect the court case in any way), it feels like there is a lack of integrity to Rebecca contacting FF.
 
  • #488
Really, I was wondering what her motivation for contacting FF -rather than anyone else - was? Axe to grind against her former team or management, rather than a genuine worry about a miscarriage of justice? Or has FF found out from someone else and persuaded her to email him?
For me currently (whose opinion does not affect the court case in any way), it feels like there is a lack of integrity to Rebecca contacting FF.
Can't see that motivation is important. What is important is whether the allegation is true and what affect that might have on events.
 
  • #489
Can't see that motivation is important. What is important is whether the allegation is true and what affect that might have on events.
What's dismissed at the time of exaggeration by the British press in 2020 now seems to have reared its head.
 
  • #490
Can't see that motivation is important. What is important is whether the allegation is true and what affect that might have on events.
How many other prisoner's cells would she have been involved in bugging during her employment and what prevented her from raising concerns about such a procedure during the trials of those defendants? I think motive may well be key.
 
  • #491
How many other prisoner's cells would she have been involved in bugging during her employment and what prevented her from raising concerns about such a procedure during the trials of those defendants? I think motive may well be key.
Whatever her motivation, it won't alter the truth of the matter.
 
  • #492
How many other prisoner's cells would she have been involved in bugging during her employment and what prevented her from raising concerns about such a procedure during the trials of those defendants? I think motive may well be key.
There's only one guy named as the prime suspect in the MM case and these at trial.
 
  • #493
There's only one guy named as the prime suspect in the MM case and these at trial.
At a guess, I would say that no other prisoner will have been bugged in the same way as CB allegedly has been
 
  • #494
Can't see that motivation is important. What is important is whether the allegation is true and what affect that might have on events.

Looks like this trial is going to be a lot more interesting and informative than expected for those of us who're really only here for the CB/MM aspect. If it becomes clear that the BKA has acted in a manner that casts doubts on their integrity, then it does open up genuine speculation as to what exactly the BKA's claims against CB amount to in the MM case.

Agree re motivation. That's neither here nor there if it turns out to be true.
 
Last edited:
  • #495
JC is claiming this is who it is, FF made no reference to a name.As to being an ex employee, people move on for any amount of reasons.
As far as I know, she was mentioned during the court proceedings on Friday. By whom, I don’t know.
 
  • #496
As far as I know, she was mentioned during the court proceedings on Friday. By whom, I don’t know.
Matters not really .
 
  • #497
How many other prisoner's cells would she have been involved in bugging during her employment and what prevented her from raising concerns about such a procedure during the trials of those defendants? I think motive may well be key.
I think this alleged wiretapping is just to create noise. If there were such concerns CB's lawyers would have raised it earlier when he was still there, since it does not appear to have any bearings on the trial. unless the prosecution are using any of these alleged wiretapped conversations as evidence, I really do not see the relevance.
 
  • #498
i wonder if this could explain what the hell they’ve been “investigating “for years. they’ve been hoping to get an admission on a wire tap.
 
  • #499
i wonder if this could explain what the hell they’ve been “investigating “for years. they’ve been hoping to get an admission on a wire tap.

We may inadvertently find out much more about the nature of the CB/MM investigation in this trial than the BKA might have wanted us to.

I'm here for it, as I'm sure anyone who's followed the MM case will be.
 
Last edited:
  • #500
How many other prisoner's cells would she have been involved in bugging during her employment and what prevented her from raising concerns about such a procedure during the trials of those defendants? I think motive may well be key.

Motive for what though? Even if it came from eg. a negative place, a grudge (although there's nothing to base that idea upon) if it happened, it happened. I doubt the defence team would be using it in court as evidence of misconduct unless it had been thoroughly checked out and verified by them.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
124
Guests online
1,724
Total visitors
1,848

Forum statistics

Threads
632,525
Messages
18,627,918
Members
243,180
Latest member
Sophie Winter
Back
Top