Discussion in 'Trials' started by cybervampira, Jul 20, 2018.
To get it out of the way? I dunno. ? MOO
ETA: What @Seattle1 said.
It's just the two sides agreeing on what the jury instructions will be. Jury won't be present.
That’s fine, as long as she isn’t buying the “Ningas of Iowa” story.
They still could have put him up there to rip him to shreds with ugly innuendo, like they have so many others.
I wonder if they will be directed on how to behave. Putting feet up, biting nails, laying back does NOT sound like someone doing their job of listening to both sides.
I have relatives from Maquoketa, IW(since passed). Granted I haven’t been in that town since 2004 at the very least. Still at the rate the defense is trying to apply…*I* could be a suspect. Doesn’t matter it’s halfway across the state(near Davenport)….in the defenses eyes I’d be a suspect too. Anything but CBR right?! *facepalm*.
You're correct! Stupid me forgot closing arguments!
Chris Gothner KCCI on Twitter
Also interesting to me that Ron Pexa's name was brought up so frequently, with some pretty serious allegations, but he was not called to testify. Appears Pexa has neither been charged nor convicted of any crime, according to Iowa Courts Online.
2:14 PM · May 26, 2021·Twitter Web App
I think the defense, especially with DJ, asked a bunch of questions like “isn’t it true blah blah blah” or didn’t you tell so-and-so blah blah blah” to which DJ answered either “I don’t know” or “I never said that”. I think the defense was just making up things hoping the jury might think he actually said that stuff. Just scum muddying up the waters.
Nicole Agee on Twitter
The prosecution may still call one or more rebuttal witnesses. Once closing arguments begin, they will be live on our main channel (@KCRG)
as well as online and on 9.2. We will also have the verdict on TV9 once it comes in.
2:16 PM · May 26, 2021·Twitter Web App
With the help of defense attorney Eric Tindal, to clarify what happened after the jury left: Both sides are reviewing the jury instructions. They will be back on the record this afternoon for any objections. This way, they're ready to go ahead of closing arguments.@KCRG
12:13 PM · May 26, 2021·Twitter Web App
I hope he sues Chad and Jennifer Frese!
I agree. On their first cross of DJ, they asked him a question to which he denied having said whatever they said. Mr. Freeze asked him "If I pull up the record would you believe it? " DJ said "yes"
Mr. Freeze then begins flipping through papers, and could not find that particular page. So he dropped it. It was fairly obvious that he was just acting though.
There is no way CB came up with that story on his own. He would have said it before. He needed the help of the defense team to come up with a story like that. I have to say, as a defense attorney, this is just ...... well, not sure what to say.
I’m thinking of suing them for polluting my brain with this cesspool defense!
YES- these two things are left hanging- with no evidence to verify or dispute. Odd to leave that dangling like that.
And I still don’t get the significance of the decomposing cows from this morning. Perhaps I was bored & dozing off… But wth was the point of that?!
To remind them that closing arguments ARE NOT TESTIMONY.
I am tired of hearing that people who are charged can sue. I read a case where a burglar broke in and fell through a sky light and sued the owner and won.
The ninja story so “perfectly” covered all the points and refuted all the evidence the defense was unable to do. Imagine that.
@PrairieWind, could they be disbarred for something like this?
I hope they put the closing together better than their questioning