I've gotten plenty of traffic tickets. Never been asked for a phone number. LE doesn't need a way to contact you. You need a way to contact the court to handle the ticket.
Yes he does, which is absolutely his legal right. A robust and effective defense, I respect that part of the judicial system. What I don't respect is a loser defendant who goes out and kills for the thrill of it because someone hurt his feelings once upon a time. Grow up, man up, you're caught dead to rights admit it, save the family of the true victims the horror of a sensationalized trial and agonizing details and just go away forever.
I don't believe there is a way the State will accept a plea deal, unless the families push for it. There's too much evidence and if this horrendous crime doesn't qualify for the DP, I don't know what does.
i don't know if it was decided whether or not those Indiana stops were independent of the ongoing investigation, but I've never seen such "chatty" traffic stops.
Perhaps he should brush up on his synonyms.
www.independent.co.uk
No way a plea deal here....he will have a defense and they will work to create some doubt...honestly don't know where they are going to get a jury.
MOO I agree that DM's observations tie the hallway man's movements to the location of the footprint. At the time of the writing of the PCA, of course, all of the shoes possibly owned by BK were not known. Hopefully, there is evidence that links the footprint to a specific shoe or type that BK owns/had/could be proved he had. It might be a reach, but if he thought he got away without tracking blood, maybe he kept the shoes.
Right I feel like a plea bargain would only be helpful if for example they could not find the bodies and he agreed to lead authorities to them in exchange for a deal or something like that. In this case, the accused really has no bargaining chip IMO
They will be able to seat a jury, it's been done many times before with high profile cases. Not everyone is as obsessed with criminal trials as us WSers.
I have some family who don't even know why I was so happy when they arrested BK, they saw it in the media, but didn't pay it much attention with everything else going on in these crazy times.
The hearsay discussion began owing to quote ascribed to LeBar in today's Daily M article where he referred to Dylan's staement as it currently stands as hearsay. The link is
I believe they were planned, too coincidental IMO. But LE/FBI may never reveal the details of it. MOO
Didn't the FBI deny it, IIRC? That right there makes me think it was planned.
It's probably because of the conversations with multiple people there that were describing what they saw. It's the intimate descriptions of the crime scene that LE and prosecutor want to protect...at this time. The gag order will also keep the trial lawyers and witnesses from speaking about it too...hopefully until the trial.I'm not understanding how the 911 call is still a part of the active investigatory records and could interfere with enforcement proceedings? It was my understanding that everyone at the house during that call was cleared.
“I think it’ll be released when the prosecution believes that we can release that,” Mr Fry said in an interview with ABC affiliate KREM-TV. “That may be at trial ... That may be before then.”
Mr Fry declined to comment on whether what was discussed in the call could lead to any arrests.
The 911 call was made at 11.58am on 13 November - while the students are thought to have been killed between 3 and 4am.
“The surviving roommates summoned friends to the residence because they believed one of the second-floor victims had passed out and was not waking up,” a statement by Moscow Police early on in the investigation read.
“Multiple people talked with the 911 dispatcher before a Moscow Police officer arrived at the location. Officers entered the residence and found the four victims on the second and third floors.”
It is unclear whether the “unconscious individual” wording is attributed to the caller or the dispatcher.
When pressed by The Independent on why the call could not be released, the department said: “The contents are exempt from public disclosure because the records are active investigatory records which, if released, would interfere with enforcement proceedings...”
Moscow police chief hints at possible release of Idaho murders 911 call
Moscow police chief James Fry offered some insight as to when the 911 call could potentially be made public
I'm still stuck on his actual wording......“The contents are exempt from public disclosure because the records are active investigatory records which, if released, would interfere with enforcement proceedings...”
valientemott.com
