montegrl
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2020
- Messages
- 294
- Reaction score
- 3,584
I've read it and read it and read it again - As you infer, it's not an objection because as the heading implies he sees himself gaining from it. It's saying wtte 'if you Mr Wood take Ms Smith on board your conversations with her will be discoverable, because we are going to be calling you as an - exculpatory - witness for LV. And since MM has now put Wood on notice of it - Wood is by implication waiving his right to object to discovery, at a later stage.'
Since it's in MM's objection to pro hac vice admission, I think MM is saying it's a ground for the court to deny the admission of Smith, otherwise court will be endorsing the discovery rights to the conversations which would otherwise be work product and non-discoverable. I see it as like a big threat to the court, or to Wood to withdraw his application, by someone whose imagination is running away with itself.
He's so audacious!
MOO
Yes and he doesn't cite any case law to support any of his wild theories either!