IMOBBM- If that were the case, the state wouldn't have such a strong objection.
Well...alrighty then!Just publicly accessible now.
Back in March 8, 2021, Lori’s fitness to proceed was drawn into question by her counsel. After a psychological assessment, the Court determined at this time the defendant is not competent to proceed and recommends restorative treatment.
Oh, I also want the same thing. Please, please, please don't let prosecutor make a deal with her!I dearly hope and pray fervently that you're right, lonetraveler. Although I would also like to see her swing/stand in front of the guns/lay on the gurney next to Chad as well. She is IMO a classic manipulator . RIP JJ and Tylee.
I predict she is frantic over all the charges and as soon as she calms down, she will sing like a bird and throw Chad under the bus.
Maybe she can drag him down with her. According to MG, it was Chad who called Lori and told her that Charles was possessed by the spirit of Nick Schneider.Likely. However, she can't throw Chad under the new bus - Charles WILL get justice!!! Hahaha. They will both fry for killing their respective spouses!
Thanks for the link. I will have to read to see exactly how that all works. I for one see her behaviour no different than when she was fighting to remove custody of the kids from Joe Ryan and she was surely evaluated then? My memory blanks. I would like to see what determines incompetence, and who picks the evaluator, and if the defense has a chance to pick their own evaluator. I hope they have someone that can see through any games she is playing as a master manipulator. Yes, I can totally see her manipulating this and that does not make her incompetent. IMHO.(1) When the defendant’s fitness to proceed is drawn in question, the issue shall be determined by the court. The court shall also determine, based on the examiner’s findings, whether the defendant lacks capacity to make informed decisions about treatment. If neither the prosecuting attorney nor counsel for the defendant contests the finding of the report filed pursuant to section 18-211, Idaho Code, the court may make the determination on the basis of such report. If the finding is contested, the court shall hold a hearing on the issue. If the report is received in evidence upon such hearing, the party who contests the finding thereof shall have the right to summon and to cross-examine the psychiatrist or licensed psychologist who submitted the report and to offer evidence upon the issue.
Idaho Code 18-212 – Determination of Fitness of Defendant to Proceed — Suspension of Proceeding and Commitment of Defendant — Postcommitment Hearing » LawServer
I agree, it has to be a new issue. My theory is that as soon as MM saw the potential death penalty he finally realized that he is way over his head and needs a DP experienced lawyer. If he is just now looking for someone that would explain the nebulous schedule. Woods was exasperated because the new attorney would not need to be present for the reading of the charges. I bet Woods sees it as another delaying tactic. The additional charges plus DP should not be surprise to anyone involved in the case. MM should have been prepared. Or he has someone in mind, but is trying to delay at every turn. Didn’t it take at least 5 years for Jodi Arias to get to trial?The verbiage is interesting to me. This wasn't something like, I will grant the continuance and we'll reconvene on "x" date at "x" time...Judge Eddins said "it would be set for a date and time certainly in the future but right now we don't know date time but we'll get that set as soon as it's feasible."
As others stated, I personally think there was substance to what transpired yesterday. What would make this ruling also prevent it from being able to be rescheduled? It almost sounded like it was outside of control of the courts. Something has to be completed/addressed for them to be able to then set a new date.
It's all super strange but I think if I had to choose one, MM is saying she does not have the ability to fully understand the charges being brought against her.
Here's a roundup of some of the theories that have been mentioned. I'm sure I missed some but
- Something medically/mentally- This should have been addressed within 90 days per Judge Boyce, however, this could be something under seal???
- MM & LV not on the same page- They don't have to be right now. Why it was prevent the reading of the charges
- Suicide, Death Threats, etc...- He obviously mentioned exigent circumstances which this would encompass but again seems as though there are resources to handle this and shouldn't prevent the charges being read
- Simple delay tactic- I personally don't see this. Judge Eddins saw enough evidence to grant it as well as noting "exigent circumstances"
- Plea deal- Still not sure why charges wouldn't be read regardless
I can't find a link so moo. I believe in a Dateline episode it was stated that someone was shooting from the back window as the Jeep was driving away. One could presume that there were at least two persons in the Jeep. IIRC, this coincides with the Jeep tire and back seat being moved to and from the storage unit in Idaho.
Thanks in advance to anyone who can provide links and make corrections if needed!
That’s it!!Just publicly accessible now.
Back in March 8, 2021, Lori’s fitness to proceed was drawn into question by her counsel. After a psychological assessment, the Court determined at this time the defendant is not competent to proceed and recommends restorative treatment.
Replying to my own message!!! I shouldn’t trust my gut feelings!!IMO
My gut reaction is that this is an MM issue. I think the state doesn’t think it is serious enough for a continuance at this early point in the proceedings. Obviously the judge disagrees.
That is a really good theory!!!Or maybe Chad dumped her.
If back on March 8, The Court determined that LV was not competent to proceed, why was it kept secret?