Seriously, what difference can it possibly make in anyone's life that the document is sealed to all but LE, the court, the state, the defendant and counsel?
No one else needs to know, people just want to see it, hoping there are some gory details contained therein.
There is no reason to chum the water, the feeding frenzy has begun based solely on speculation and opinion.
If there is a trial, which I doubt will happen, the details will then be public.
Every person accused of a crime is cloaked in the presumption of innocence and is entitled to vigorous representation.
Whomever RMA retains as counsel has the duty to make the state prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant is guilty.
For the UK inquirer, private attorneys can turn down any case, public defense counsel (free lawyer) gets assigned to represent the impoverished by the Public Defenders Office. The PD may get stuck with an unpleasant case, but is obligated to exercise vigorous representation.
It doesn't matter if the lawyer believes the client is guilty, duty is duty. The only thing the attorney can not do is put her client on the stand and ask questions knowing that the client's answers will be a lie. It is subornation of perjury.
There are several aspects of this case.
- two girls were killed, less than a mile from one's home, in a public place, in the middle of the day, by a person whom they, as it appears, did not even recognize.
- during five years of a costly investigation, many locals were suspected by the public and media, as the result of which some were demoted, some made life decisions they might later regret, and some spent time in jail, officially, for unrelated charges that many question.
- During that time, the local sherif said that the citizens of Delphi were not in danger.
- now, as it seems, the citizens of Delphi, and more so, their kids, were in obvious danger. The man who has been arrested and accused of killing the teenagers, lived in the middle of Delphi, worked in the local pharmacy, spent evenings in the popular bar, and was never recognized as the murderer. During these five years, the citizens of Delphi, their children and the unsuspecting public were at risk, as the man was free to roam Indiana and could have visited other states. Also, during these five years, several cases of human trafficking and a pedophile ring were uncovered next to/within Delphi. One of the murdered girls was victim of online pedophile attacks and catfishing; while officially unrelated to murders, no one can fully disprove the connection, yet.
- the state police seems to be positive that the arrested man is the murderer. Neither proof that it is the same man nor the reason for his arrest have been released to the public. Moreover, the arrest affidavit has been sealed. Amidst the expected confusion, new theories have been generated by amateur enthusiasts, some reasonable, other, questionable. The public's interest is piqued by the fact that midway into the investigation, the official sketch of the suspect, his age range, height and looks, all have underwent dramatic change. While the recently arrested man might bear some resemblance to the first sketch, he looks very different from sketch nr 2 by all parameters, including height and age group. In fact, the difference is so significant, that the current suspect is known to have had his pictures taken next to the sketch number 2; on the photo, there is very little similarity between the sketch and the person currently arrested.
While the public has been actively following the case for 5 years and supportive of the investigation, diligently following all press conferences and watching films about the case featuring law enforcement officers, it naturally would like to know what kind of "old detective work", using law enforcement's parlance, led to the murderer being captured.
Everyone understands the need for privacy for the deceased victims and their families. At the same time, the public, predictably, would like to rest assured that they and mostly, their own children are safe from the dangerous predator who killed two teenagers in Delphi, Indiana. Given prior confusing aspects of the investigation, it needs to see that this lengthy and dangerous path has, indeed, ended.
Sadly, the statement of judge Diener, who expressed fear for himself and his own family, does not provide such reassurance. Given the fact that the killer is behind bars, it is not even quite clear who might be threatening the safety of the judge, law enforcement officers and their families, as mentioned in the court documents.
If someone is, however, such a person might definitely be considered a publuc enemy.
All this considered, the public, obviously, has reasons to be worried about own security.
Weighing all the abovementioned facts, there seem to be more pros than cons to unseal the AA.