Absolutely. But there is a reason to believe the car is associated with BG. More than a reason, actually, as
@kc1023 pointed out.
Are there scenarios and stories one can draw up to show why he traveled only on foot...sure!
Is it reasonable to do so given the PC lead off with a req for info in the driver of a vehicle, and given LE saying "The importance of the car also ties into why police now believe the killer is local...."? I dont think it is. <modsnip: personalizing>
And im not quite following...
So LE needs help identifying the driver of a car, because they are a witness to BG, but they dont know who that witness is? How exactly do they know he/she is a witness then? Im not seeing any logic there. What am I missing?
And which is more likely? That LE needs the public's help finding the driver of a parked car between 12 and 5 because they are a witness but they dont know who it is, but somehow know they are a witness....
Or
It was BG that parked his (or someone's) car there ?