RSBM for clarity.
I may get timed-out or banned for this, but with one poster calling for my head on a pike and another asking for answers, I guess I might as well say what is already known.
The searchers found girls undergarments in the water (as well as other items) and they were sealed in evidence bags for this case. If that doesn't speak to sexual assault or debasement, I don't know what does.
To the moderators, I sincerely apologize if this information is not allowed, but I am being hammered by one poster in particular who believes I have no basis for my opinion, which is allowed to be posted on this board of opinions.
Because I'm old-school WebSleuths, having been here off and on for 17 years, I forget to put all the MOOS on my post. We didn't used to have to do that.
If I put a big fat MOO right here, will that get a certain poster off my back that I have a right to follow the expertise of profilers, my own expertise, and the words of the investigator at the press conference?
Anyone is welcome to disagree with me. No one is welcome to berate me, tell me I'm jumping to conclusions, and attack me personally for merely stating my opinion.
I was asked where I obtained the information. I gave it. Apparently, that was not enough, and now the unsatisfied poster is gearing up to hound me off the board.
I thought we were having an intelligent discussion of evidence and ideas. I didn't know some posters see it as an opportunity for attack and belittlement. But no matter. I will gracefully bow out. To those who are providing much appreciated information and brilliant commentary, thank you. It has been a pleasure. Ta.