GrouchoMarxist
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2019
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 242
THIS!! They've got a lot more information than anyone in the public. They know what they're doing and they've got reasons for their methods. JMO
Absolutely agree.
THIS!! They've got a lot more information than anyone in the public. They know what they're doing and they've got reasons for their methods. JMO
Yet LE has said over and over again that this impedes their investigation.Really? This article says otherwise: 8 times crimes were solved by the internet
They have said it wss one person's voice on the clip. And that voice is the BG who is also the face of the sketch who is the murderer. But they have never come out and said they know he acted alone. They never have mentioned any other person except in the first few days when they said they didnt know if he acted alone.Didn’t the LE say there was only one person involved? I’m sure I remember hearing and seeing that. Correct me if I’m wrong.
Thank you for that. I've never thought there was any sound from the girls like some allege they have heard. On top of that, why would BG be louder than any noise from the girls given he was further away? Why would LE alter the recording to lower/distort the girls but yet still for some reason leave their sounds in there? It makes no sense. Your explanation is certainly THE most plausible IMO. Thank you.
A fraction of a second? Wow, that would be an incredible speed reader!How is it an impediment to the investigation? Takes a fraction of a second to read it and move on. If they start being fussy about: “only send us the good tips”, they’re apt to dissuade people who have important information.
If you lose your wallet, is it not an impediment to answer the phone from your old aunt Joe who says she saw your wallet once on Christmas, 2014?
That's right. 30,000 tips impeded the investigation.A fraction of a second? Wow, that would be an incredible speed reader!
I can't read through a single thread on this case, much less all 96 threads. I find it exhausting to try to read 1200 posts of random speculation.
But I have the luxury of not bothering, because I'm not responsible for catching a killer. Police can't be as casual about it, they probably have to systematically log every tip, and create documentation to track it: who submitted it, subject, who considered and processed it, the relevance, follow-up, etc etc.
You don't have to name a person, but you can link an article for viewers to read on their own. Same even with social media, you can't quote something that comes from FB or YT but you can say, there is an interesting post on BP's FB or so and so's YT and viewers can check it out themselves.The thread is moving fast so I will post my question on a MSM Source again.
They believe there is only one person responsible for the murder, but that possibly others know what he has done.They have said it wss one person's voice on the clip. And that voice is the BG who is also the face of the sketch who is the murderer. But they have never come out and said they know he acted alone. They never have mentioned any other person except in the first few days when they said they didnt know if he acted alone.
Heavy is MSM and has been quoted on this and many other WS theads before.
I'm wondering if the 'couple' a witness saw from the bridge could be BG and one of the girls. From a distance of 70+ feet, the person may not have been able to surmise that it was a negative encounter (to put it mildly), but rather observed a male and female from the bridge. Maybe the other girl was out of view.
And actually further....until a trial by his peers has determined his innocence or guilt.Hounding strangers is not OK. Even if someone is the perp, unless he is arrested, in the eyes of law, he is innocent.
Wow, something just hit me when you asked why would BG be louder than any noise from the girls. Maybe he DID see Libby's phone and maybe he took her phone and shoved it in HIS pocket which would make his voice easier to hear. Everyone wonders why BG didn't take the phone, and assumes he did not take the phone off of Libby. Well maybe he did and maybe that is why we hear him fairly well. I personally have dropped my phone out of my pocket just walking in the woods and have to back track to find it, and this is just with normal walking. This killer was marching girls, possibly struggling with girls, who knows what else. Maybe the phone was dropped near the crime scene as he left and he did not realize it fell out. Or maybe the information went into the cloud and he kept the phone.
Yes I do, he quenched his sick thirst when he killed the girls, but how long before he gets the urge again ? If the urge was there in the first place then imo it will always be there.A young perp killing about power makes me think we have a beginning serial on our hands. iirc a policeman said he needs to be caught before he does
Does anyone else think this is the beginning of a serial killer?
Here is an article on serials and power I found interesting
Serial Homicide for Power and Control
More like: ‘when I was over at his house, I thought I saw the edge of something blue sticking out from under the couch. But what color is his wallet? Probably isn’t blue. I’d better not bother him.’ Six months later, blue wallet is found kicked under the couch.
You have to encourage tips from the timid. And that involves enduring stupid tips from the over-eager. In my opinion, anyway.
If you lose your wallet, is it not an impediment to answer the phone from your old aunt Joe who says she saw your wallet once on Christmas, 2014?
But that’s what we thought about the first sketch which was presumably correlated with the image on the video and a witness[es].
I think Redbeard has it figured out. I think there was a text or call alert. Maybe even Libby’s dad trying to reach them.
all imo