This is great, thank you so much. (ETA: I overspoke... I need to keep in mind that this video is only this person's own IDEAS about where the perp and girls were on the bridge, but is not LE provided and has not been officially approved as being authentic or correct in any way as far as placement or location or measurements go.FWIW. Because, in the first video he only shrinks the guy and attempts to line him up in the picture and tries to force him to fit the angle the bridge pic was taken at, and then in the second video he treats his resulting image from video 1 as though it's got some sort of bearing on the perp's ACTUAL location on the bridge.. IYKWIM... it's entirely speculation on his end, ,but what I like is the views of the bridge from above and the surrounding area and where the girls were found. The guy did good sleuthing, a good attempt, but even where he's trying to say he can show the bent over tree is significant... it's not, because in teh google earth image he's comparing it to EVERY tree appears to be bent over the river... it's a valiant attempt but IMO could actually ed up almost doing more harm than good if people start to get photoshop-starstruck, thinking this looks so technologically advanced that it must be correct... )
He (GH) went by the same reference as I did placing the POI on that spot on the bridge, and that is:
1. knowing that the suspect had to be moving in a SE direction on the bridge due to the
shadow he is casting at the approximate time of the day (even if all you know is it is past noon..)
2.
checking all trees from a
video, where the poster filmed his walk over the Monon High Bridge moving SE-wards and even turning the cam around a few times, so we can get a glimpse towards the NW of the bridge.
That very
characteristic tree growth on the W side of the bridge close to the
5th platform counting from NW to SE is the clue of finding the location of the POI on the bridge. The available bridge walk video on youtube by another poster shows everything in full leaf, so it made it a tad more difficult to find that spot. Then again, knowing it is close to one of the platforms gives you a head-start.
Even if you go by
elimination i.e. eliminating all other possible spots / areas close to a platform (regardless if one understands the shadow and wants to check bot West and East platforms), you will still find the spot.
Next, the
crime scene:
As you can see in my comment on youtube, I very much liked the fact, that he actually counted the shadows of the tree limbs/major trunks reflected by the water besides comparing the main tree-lines.
This is another very characteristic tree, just one main trunk, very little or less extended side braches.
He also went by the hill and the indentation of the landscape, when determining the location, not just by the bend of one tree.
None of it is confirmed by LE, I agree. But it is a real possibility and supported by videos and stills. After watching the two videos, it does look to me there is a good chance the POI and a victim/ the victims crossed the creek around that spot.
Marker 3:34 of the second video (part 2) clearly shows how shallow the creek is in that area. Another possible indication, that the POI knows that area rather well - unless one of the victims or both victims tried to escape and ran through the creek and he caught up with one or both of them.
I am still not sure, if the events all occurred consecutively connected to each other, or if we have a gap between taking the victims/ luring the victims and then possibly crossing that creek.
If we theorize, the POI was not aware of Libby recording via video/ audio, and Libby possibly tried to escape shouting I got you on video you s
s
. of a b
, he may have gotten ultimately enraged, caught her and killed her.
I am just having a hard time consolidating the outcome, the location, the surroundings and the chance that they may be seen or may be heard by other hikers. That alone almost dictates the possibility, that something very particular happened, that triggered at least- part of the events i.e. mainly eliminating Libby.
Just my thoughts,
Nin