All the more reason for Border Security, and bringing our military home from Iraq, so they can help protect our homeland.
Amen. I was watching TV tonight and aviation expert Michael Boyd was speaking. He says that Homeland Security isn't run by security experts, but political appointees. Therefore, their announcements about "what might happen", are not accurate.
He said there would not have been spread of explosion and conflagration as was announced; it wouldn't have happened. This plan was not very plausible, they had no backing (financial), no support, and WERE NOT SMART.
He said the biggest threat in an attack like this is the disruption of our economy (shutting down JFK for a long time would be devastating)
Many of these "plots" have been caught by "entrapment" by an FBI member; while well and good in some ways, it's hard to prove it would have gone on without the help of the "entrappers".
I'm thinking like Buzz now, so many of these plots have turned out to be "not past the beginning stages", they involve people already here in the country, etc - not really AlQueda ties, etc. They have not even used the illegal wiretapping.
By that standard, "Cho" was a terrorist too who was not foiled, and massacred 22 students. We have homegrown terrorists everywhere - shooters at the malls, etc. If they turned out to be Islamic, I'm sure we would begin getting metal detectors at the malls, schools, etc.
Is our government "crying wolf" too many times, trying to assure us we are being protected? (from goofballs, Curly and Mo?) Are we going to listen when a really BIG one comes along, or is it going to get by us again.
The FBI seems to be doing its job, but I'd feel better if Homeland Security were run by extremely bright, capable experts on security; not politically motivated.