I am frustrated with the conclusions drawn when we have on our hands a woman with the sexual appetite of a small village.
With all due respect to Dr Drew (Dr Phil doesn't even do this) he immediately shakes his head in that fatherly way and to paraphrase (when someone is saying for god sake she killed that person then slept with her bf the next day, then a 3rd man 2 days later! "well hold on now,
accelerated hypersexuality partner multiplicity is often a the symptom of sexual abuse when they were younger. The person becomes unaware of dates and times and centuries."
WHAT? Can't we just for one minute entertain the possibility that she is using her sexuality (which for some women) works darn good to move and shake your way through life? I know several women would could have a few partners in a few weeks and they were not abused? (this goes both ways, men also)
Not every behavior that results in killing someone was because they were physically or sexually abused.. some people are just BAD!
I would just like to hear more balance so we might tune in to hear something fresh and new, not a defense of every murderer as if he wants to be their friend, to understand them. I understand the doctor side of someone might have this huge curiosity to diagnose them and figure them out.. Great do it. But don't insult the many real victims of serious abuse that just don't go slaughter people.
Some people that have been through the worst of the worst abuse of all kinds and trauma are the most compassionate caring people and they really can speak from the heart. They won't all slice you up when you turn around and just go nutty.. They're more stable and understanding than a lot of people that never had a hard day in their life.
(ps. I made up some words in the top part ha ha
