I sure hope so. It would be nice if someone could the world what a complete idiot Tracy is.Nehemiah said:I wonder if this will spark a lawsuit by Mr. X, who is implicated in the murder.
sissi said:I was reading Patsy's interview last night, not the NE book, but the taped one that hasn't been edited, and I noticed something interesting. Patsy was asked about the dog, and the comings and goings between the houses ,then she was asked about "any other dogs". Does this not indicate the interest in "other dogs" could point to the fur in her hands as being from another dog, not her little white cuddly one. She mentioned a boy across the street, I believe his name was "luke" as having a German Shepherd. Nothing more was asked so can we "assume" that isn't the type of dog that shed those hairs? Or.......were they from the cuddly little white one? and if so...how did they get in her hands if she hadn't seen him that evening? He was at the Barnhill's.
aRnd2it said:I sure hope so. It would be nice if someone could the world what a complete idiot Tracy is.
Jayelles said:His day will come. I hope the critics are watching. I'm glad Keenan has set the record straight about the "new" evidence". That was precisely a comment we made about it (that the "new" evidence wasn't new at all - nor was it really "evidence").
I hope Mr. Gigax is watching and has his lawyer contact the TV network to threaten them with a lawsuit before the show airs.Jayelles said:His day will come. I hope the critics are watching.
Thanks Jayelles! I guess the source of the fur in her hands may have been dog, but not her own dog. If she had not been taken out of the house , what kind of dog fur could be in her hands? Has anyone ever mentioned a dog at the White's? I don't recall anything about a dog. This is a very important clue, IMO, one that points more toward an intruder.Jayelles said:Sissi, we have two of the same breed of little white dogs as Jacques and they don't shed many hairs at all. They are little "hypo-allergenic" dogs LOL They shed hairs when they are getting groomed, but rarely through ordinary contact.
aRnd2it said:I hope Mr. Gigax is watching and has his lawyer contact the TV network to threaten them with a lawsuit before the show airs.
Nehemiah said:Jay, can you believe that this is going to be shown again? I truly thought that after it aired in the UK, that would be the end of it since it implicates Mr. X in the murder. Thanks to your great sleuthing abilities, I might add. :clap:
sissi said:Thanks Jayelles! I guess the source of the fur in her hands may have been dog, but not her own dog. If she had not been taken out of the house , what kind of dog fur could be in her hands? Has anyone ever mentioned a dog at the White's? I don't recall anything about a dog. This is a very important clue, IMO, one that points more toward an intruder.
Right. Those were chew marks on the back door frame.Jayelles said:I thought it was supposed to be a beaver he brought in with him ;-)
Nehemiah said:Sissi, with all due respect for your theory, I just can't imagine an intruder bringing in all the items he did, plus a dog. Or, are you saying that the dog may have been outside waiting, or even in another location?
I bet that L Wood will represent Mr. X in a lawsuit. :crazy:
sissi said:I believe it was another location, a garage or other outbuilding in the neighborhood. The scream was heard IMO because she was closer to the Stanton's house .
Maybe there was less risk returning her than having someone hunt for a killer? It worked ,didn't it?Nehemiah said:Why would the perp risk taking her back inside the house?