4SAM
Kentucky - Texas - Kansas - Missouri
- Joined
- May 27, 2013
- Messages
- 1,416
- Reaction score
- 1,334
My goodness. This is such a bizarre case. I'm impressed with LE in this case.From the link -
Tinnell believes the girl could have been inside someone's home during the course of her disappearance, and said on Monday that he is asking for a forensic medical examination to determine if the little girl had eaten over the time she went missing. The examination can also help determine whether the girl had been sexually assaulted.
And Tinnell said it's unusual that Charlee was found with dirt all over her, but the family dog that was thought to be with her was found on Friday very clean.
Tinnell said the investigation has not turned criminal, but he believes there will be criminal charges filed eventually.
VIDEO: Bullitt Co. Sheriff doubts missing girl was wandering the woods alone
Paraphrased (by me) from the end of video with Sheriff Tinnell
The reporter asks a question about the arrest of NQ's boyfriend.
The sheriff states that CQ is NQ's husband but not Charlee's father. CQ was at the scene and he went back in those woods a few times and we were suspicious of it. When he came back to the house he got ugly and said some things he shouldn't be saying. They did a warrant check on him and found out he had outstanding warrants so they took him into custody.
From the link -
Tinnell believes the girl could have been inside someone's home during the course of her disappearance, and said on Monday that he is asking for a forensic medical examination to determine if the little girl had eaten over the time she went missing. The examination can also help determine whether the girl had been sexually assaulted.
And Tinnell said it's unusual that Charlee was found with dirt all over her, but the family dog that was thought to be with her was found on Friday very clean.
Tinnell said the investigation has not turned criminal, but he believes there will be criminal charges filed eventually.
VIDEO: Bullitt Co. Sheriff doubts missing girl was wandering the woods alone
Paraphrased (by me) from the end of video with Sheriff Tinnell
The reporter asks a question about the arrest of NQ's boyfriend.
The sheriff states that CQ is NQ's husband but not Charlee's father. CQ was at the scene and he went back in those woods a few times and we were suspicious of it. When he came back to the house he got ugly and said some things he shouldn't be saying. They did a warrant check on him and found out he had outstanding warrants so they took him into custody.
On Friday I had pointed people to the live feed from WAVE 3 to listen to Charlee's mother's interview. In that interview at the 1:25 mark pay attention to what Charlee's mother says about the custody situation.
Here is a link to the interview. Like I said, pay attention at the 1:25 mark.
Charlee Campbell: Mother of missing child shares emotions, says 'it's not a custody battle'
I think that the Sheriff may not have the custody situation right. I don't think there was a problem between Grandma and Mother.
To me, it implies that Grandpa had custody in name only. I had mentioned earlier on the thread on Friday that it is was possible that Charlee may not have been at the Grandparent's house when Charlee's father came to try and have visitation. The sheriff had said Charlee's father had been in the area with family and was denied visitation.
So again, to me, it leads me to believe that Charlee's father or his family may have been indicating that they were going to get to the bottom of why it is they won't let him see her. If the court had decided that Charlee's mother could not have custody or have her over night or in the same home with her boyfriend (or is it husband?) but Charlee was, in fact, staying with mom it could have the same result we see now - CPS involved and custody being examined.
I would like to know just when Charlee's father showed up to try and see Charlee. I think the phone records that law enforcement are going after are going to show how this all played out.
I don’t understand the quote from the homeowner who found her that she handed her a bottle? Where did the bottle come from? A baby bottle? A pop bottle? Or did homeowner give her a bottle?
The key takeaway for me is that she had said that she could have Charlee whenever she wanted and that she saw Charlee every day. If she could have Charlee whenever she wanted then I wonder if that was the intent of the court custody order. I mean why not just give custody to Charlee's mother if what she says is true.It sounds like she's defending herself. She doesn't wipe away tears until she says "there ain't no reason for me to do something crazy because I can have my daughter whenever I want too". It seems like it's a defense of me, me, me.
Maybe this is an unfair characterization and I'm jaded with so many cases of precious children that are neglected.
From the link -
Tinnell believes the girl could have been inside someone's home during the course of her disappearance, and said on Monday that he is asking for a forensic medical examination to determine if the little girl had eaten over the time she went missing. The examination can also help determine whether the girl had been sexually assaulted.
And Tinnell said it's unusual that Charlee was found with dirt all over her, but the family dog that was thought to be with her was found on Friday very clean.
Tinnell said the investigation has not turned criminal, but he believes there will be criminal charges filed eventually.
This article says the homeowner/neighbor who found her tried giving Charlee water, and she instantly threw up. I'm thinking it was a bottle of water.
Sheriff has doubts missing toddler, now in state custody, was in woods alone for 32 hours before being found