UKGuy,
I wonder how the nightgown ties in with the Christmas 1996 Barbie found next to her in the wine cellar. In its original packaging?
Part of the stage?
Who would do that do you suppose?
How much do you believe JB had to do with the crime scene; as found? Obviously she took part in the consumption of pineapple from their fridge. Somethings can’t be covered up. Things were over looked. Or is that brushed under the rug?
Rain on my Parade,
IMO what you get in the wine-cellar is all staging, even BR's birthday gifts.
It's the outcome of dismantling a prior staging, this is why there are bloodstains on the nightgown.
If there actually was a barbie doll left in the wine-cellar, then it would seem like abandoned staging, since it would not really represent an
actual crime-scene, only that of one fabricated to hide evidence.
If it is on the BPD evidence list or somebody credible can testify to its existence then rather than simply representing staging it might be a critical part of the case?
i.e. Did Burke Ramsey return back down stairs once everyone was in their bedroom and retreive a Barbie Doll intended as a supplemental Christmas gift during the upcoming vacation?
I reckon folks are looking in all the wrong places for clues. The breakfast bar was ignored by the Ramsey's, note the plural, as they all forgot about it, it meant nothing to them, evidentially it was irrelevant.
We know different of course, as the pineapple demonstrates JonBenet was awake
after returning from the White's.
So along with JonBenet's
two ponytails, the above assumptions, her
missing pink pajama bottoms, which Patsy claimed were
not on her bed when she put JonBenet to bed, we can assume JonBenet made it to her bed, wearing her pink pajama set.
Otherwise you have to suggest there was a prior staging that incorporated the
two ponytails?
Things were overlooked, we know as nobody from BPD bagged the fecally soiled pajamas for inclusion on the evidence list, then there is JonBenet's candy-box smeared with fecal matter, again was this bagged and stored in an evidence cage? If yes, were there any dna lab test ran on the fecal matter?
It's as if the investigators know not to go there, as cross-referencing any dna-results with that of the Ramsey's might yield an unwanted match?
I keep returning to my original theory that there were multiple staging events, how else to explain the forensic complexity ?
They might go something like this:
Staging event 1: The basement.
Staging event 2 : JonBenet's bedroom.
Staging event 3 : The Wine-Cellar.
IMO the GJ should have leveled a First Degree Homicide True Bill against Patsy as there is enough forensic evidence to not only place her at the alleged crime-scene, but also on the ligature/device that killed JonBenet.
Why do I cite 1, 2 and 3? As there is forensic evidence linking all three locations, e.g. pink pajama bottoms missing from 2. Along with the barbie nightgown appearing in 3. And of course the blue samsonite suitcase along with other miscellaneous items pop up in varying places in 1.
The entirety of the forensic evidence does not match the Ramsey version of events. This can demonstrate that the Ramsey's colluded post-mortem.
Also if the holiday barbie doll is verified then it's possible it played a role in a staging setup by Patsy, using the doll and nightgown in a staged crime-scene?
How much do you believe JB had to do with the crime scene; as found?
Depends on what you think took place, e.g. JonBenet dressing up in barbie nightgown, etc for another family member, or did JonBenet join Burke down in the basement to fetch the size-12's, the doll or both, with it all tragically going wrong?
As the Ramsey's ignored the kitchen we can rule it out, leaving the basement and JonBenet's bedroom as the focus for investigation.
.