Lola
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2004
- Messages
- 1,432
- Reaction score
- 5
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whoa... Quote from this article:
"A law enforcement source told ABC News Wednesday that police found 16 pairs of women's panties in the home of Philip Markoff, the Boston University Medical student charged with the murder of a sex worker who was shot dead in an upscale hotel room.
The panties were hidden under Markoff's bed in the Quincy home he shared with his fiancee. Along with the panties was a large bag with roughly 60 pairs of plastic flex-cuff restraints, the law enforcement source said."
I'm wondering why she never found any of this stuff: 16 pr of panties (not hers) and a bag of 60 of those plastic tie-up thingies. Maybe she never vacuumed under the bed? I guess if she went to school in St. Kitts she might not have been in the apartment enough to do any cleaning or look under the bed.
i have a question, why is Markoff being allowed a private lawyer at public expense? wouldn't this be more expensive than a public defender? is this a normal thing that happens often? thanks! (i apologize if this has been discussed somewhere, i only have limited time to check the threads!)
QUOTE
"ABC News has also obtained court documents in which Markoff, a medical student, pleads poverty. The documents claim that he has not received any financial support from his family for several years and that he is living off student loans that total $130,000.
In response, the court ordered Markoff's lawyer, John Salsberg, to defend him at the public's expense, the court documents state"
http://abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=7464224&page=2
Maybe he had them in shoe boxes, who ever looks in their boyfriends shoe boxes? The could've been in a lock box... who knows.
I was freaked out about the 16 pairs of underwear, what is scaring me even more is that no more women have stepped forward as victims. I would've thought that if there were more they would've been found since he left the girl he killed in the room.
The time when his brother and sister-n-law were photographed I really thought that the sis-n-law was smiling. I'd bet you money she knew something was "off" w/PM for awhile, probably caused some tension in the relationship. Her husband sitting next to her just had the look of a husband who had just heard, "didn't I always tell you." Husbands must hate to hear that.
The question in my mind is "Was it the thrill of the kill or the thrill of gambiling?" I tend to favor the first. I'm sure that LE is checking on any missing women. And couldn't they take DNA from the missing women's clothing and match it up to the panties?
This man was a train wreck rolling at full speed. Thank God they caught him.
Hello fellow WS'ers..I'm not really a poster, but am an avid reader..this time, I had to weigh in..after reading everything out there to read on this case, my opinion is that Markoff was a killer by accident. I don't believe he ever intended to physically harm his victims..one of them said her was very polite, and assured her that no harm would come to her if she was quiet...she was, and he kept his word..no physical harm.Another victim stated that he ran when her husband came in..if he were intent on killing his victims, or, was afraid of being identified, they would both be dead. I believe his reaction to JuLissa was his survival instinct kicking in..not survival in the literal sense, but, survival of his life as he knew it..she was threatening to take that away. I could go for the "heat of the moment" defense, if I were on the jury. I'm certainly not condoning his robbery of them, but, I do understand gambling addictions..they are as addictive as heroine and nicotine. At some point, all that matters is finding the means to play another hand..they can't see beyond that.I believe he felt that the money he was taking was ill-gotten gains via prostitution, and in his mind it was no different than ill-gotten gains from robbery..from one criminal to another.As far as his sexual perversions are concerned..I see him not much different than 95% of the rest of the human race..it may not be talked about, but, it is certainly not uncommon.
Regarding his lawyer, John Salsberg - he initially came to be on the case because he is...
Founding member and co-chair of Suffolk Lawyers for Justice, a non profit organization coordinating the provision of private assigned counsel to indigent criminal defendants charged with superior and district court felonies and misdemeanors.
http://www.zimbio.com/John+Salsberg/articles/1/John+Salsberg+Defense+attorney+accused+Craigslist
I cannot find the original article that mentioned this - it was in one of the very first articles when the case first broke. I imagine the state has a standard fee they pay lawyers under these circumstances, and I don't think he will be receiving his usual and customary fees.
As for the collecting of souvenirs, we don't yet know who they belong to..could be old girlfriends, for all we know..the keeping of these items, again, is not uncommon..I've had boyfriends in past relationships want to keep them..some asked, and one took them without asking, I later learned..it IS a souvenir of their conquest..nothing deviant about that. We also don't KNOW whether or not there was any sexual contact with his victims..it's not like they are going to be exactly upfront about prostituting themselves, especially to authorities.Lastly, I'm not yet ready to go out on the limb and say that interest in trannys or same gender sex is deviant or perverted behavior..again, if it is,then society consists of mostly deviants..your neighbors, your doctors, your attorneys, and teachers..
I cannot find the original article that mentioned this - it was in one of the very first articles when the case first broke. I imagine the state has a standard fee they pay lawyers under these circumstances, and I don't think he will be receiving his usual and customary fees.
I swear I remember reading somewhere that they cap the attorney fees at $100 per hour for indigent cases -- but of course I can't track it down anywhere... It's tough getting old!