Madeleine McCann: German Prisoner Identified as Suspect #32

[Davieson]

He has amongst a long list of other offences been convicted of rape and also sexual crimes against children and possessing CP, not just charged. You act as if the crimes he has committed are normal behavior.
What is known about CB is disturbing, a violent thief, rapist, woman beating, drug dealing pedophile. What is unknown about him is the worrying part. Unfortunately we know next to nothing about him, there are other victims, some may still come forward, some may be unable to for unknown reasons.
He is a menace to society and should never be released.
Anyone who supports someone like CB should take a long look in the mirror and then go seek professional help.

I was suggesting that 'multitude' was a bit of an exaggeration.
There is a world of difference between supporting and attempting to keep the record straight.

 

[Sharkbite]

He should still enjoy the presumption of innocence in regards to Madeleine McCann.

Of course, I talk only of the crimes he has been convicted for and the crimes he has committed that are yet to catch up with him.

 

[JB1510]

May be of interest to some the MWT documentary which aired in the uk at the end of last year now has two further episodes one of which looks at IG case . I haven’t watched yet but there are free 7 day sign ups via Amazon Prime or by Paramount Plus direct .

Madeleine McCann - Watch on Paramount Plus

www.paramountplus.com

Edit - Apologies I’ve just seen it’s been previously posted , for some reason I’ve had no recent post notifications on my profile . Thought it had been very quiet ! Hope you’re all doing well .

 

[onemoremiletogo]

Will BKA be expecting that these charges related to the 4 sex offenses could disturb CB into despair, "pressuring" him and get a confession in exchange for "better" conditions in prison?!

 

[Woodburnbay]

I very much doubt that German prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters reads The Mail

Madeleine McCann: Public 'would reach same conclusion' on suspect

Prosecutor says if public "knew the evidence we had" they would think Madeleine McCann was killed.

www.bbc.co.uk

No but the people who do, and their are still millions of them, believe all of this nonsense and the real criminals live to fight another day.

 

[Woodburnbay]

IMO there are quite a few on this thread who believe CB might well be guilty in the MM case.

Well lets hope that they are not summonsed to appear as jurors then. There is a lack of evidence to suggest he is and is almost being tried by MSM and SM already without a jury.

 

[C.greek]

Well lets hope that they are not summonsed to appear as jurors then. There is a lack of evidence to suggest he is and is almost being tried by MSM and SM already without a jury.

Germany has no lay jury

 

[Davieson]

In the court of public opinion everyone is a juror .

 

[mrjitty]

Will BKA be expecting that these charges related to the 4 sex offenses could disturb CB into despair, "pressuring" him and get a confession in exchange for "better" conditions in prison?!

I think all these sorts of theories suffer from the problem that Braunschweig would simply charge if the case was strong enough instead of playing 9 dimensional chess.

Confessing to murder is hardly likely to get him better conditions

And there are significant risks not charging a serious case you have.

e.g what happens if a witness recants over the next year, or you don't win the HB trial?

IMO they'd bring HB and MM together if they could have

 

[RichardKimble]

Germany has no lay jury

Good job too, with a prosecutor saying before any trial you'd think him guilty if you knew what we knew, not up to him to determine his guilt.This was in Dec 2020, so maybe not.

A prosecutor who believes Madeleine McCann was killed by a German sex offender says the public would reach the same conclusion if they "knew the evidence we had".

Madeleine McCann: Public 'would reach same conclusion' on suspect

Prosecutor says if public "knew the evidence we had" they would think Madeleine McCann was killed.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[mrjitty]

Call me old fashioned but to me this quote is alarming for rule of law.

There is absolutely no need or justification for the prosecutors' office to be saying this. If the prosecutor can go around claiming people are guilty of offences based on secret evidence they are not allowed to know about, you quickly get into a Kafka situation which makes me worried this approach would be misused.

Why didn't he just say we hold evidence sufficient to justify these steps, and I can't comment further.

Mr Wolters said: "If you knew the evidence we had you would come to the same conclusion as I do but I can't give you details because we don't want the accused to know what we have on him - these are tactical considerations."

 

[RichardKimble]

IMO there are quite a few on this thread who believe CB might well be guilty in the MM case.

IMO its suspect bias, there 's little or no information pertaining to an alleged abduction nor the alleged murder .

 

[Dave55]

Well lets hope that they are not summonsed to appear as jurors then. There is a lack of evidence to suggest he is and is almost being tried by MSM and SM already without a jury.

According to the BKA there's evidence to show he is...depends wether you think wolters would make such s statement if he didn't have it....or perhaps you think there's so much evidence against the parents CB couldn't be invikved

 

[enquirer6]

This is what was said.

Mr Wolters said they have no idea how she died and no DNA or photo evidence linking the German sex offender to the alleged murder.

Prosecutor '100% convinced' suspect abducted and murdered Madeleine McCann

Madeleine McCann prosecutors say they have no body and no DNA but other evidence leads to only one conclusion - jailed rapist Christian Brueckner is guilty and could be charged next year

www.mirror.co.uk

That article is 2 years old, though.

Call me old fashioned but to me this quote is alarming for rule of law.

There is absolutely no need or justification for the prosecutors' office to be saying this. If the prosecutor can go around claiming people are guilty of offences based on secret evidence they are not allowed to know about, you quickly get into a Kafka situation which makes me worried this approach would be misused.

Why didn't he just say we hold evidence sufficient to justify these steps, and I can't comment further.

What was your take on Amaral's book?

 

[onemoremiletogo]

“Was I or my vehicle clearly seen near the crime scene on the night of the crime? Are there DNA traces of me at the crime scene?"

“Are there DNA traces of the injured party in my vehicle? Are there any other traces of the damaged party in my possession? Photos? And, not to forget, is there a dead body?"

In CB's letter, the retrospective check of that "perfect" plan and evidence destroyed afterwards?!

 

[Denis R Tandib]

“Was I or my vehicle clearly seen near the crime scene on the night of the crime? Are there DNA traces of me at the crime scene?"

“Are there DNA traces of the injured party in my vehicle? Are there any other traces of the damaged party in my possession? Photos? And, not to forget, is there a dead body?"

In CB's letter, the retrospective check of that "perfect" plan and evidence destroyed afterwards?!

Perhaps… or he is innocent of the crime.

 

[Denis R Tandib]

Call me old fashioned but to me this quote is alarming for rule of law.

There is absolutely no need or justification for the prosecutors' office to be saying this. If the prosecutor can go around claiming people are guilty of offences based on secret evidence they are not allowed to know about, you quickly get into a Kafka situation which makes me worried this approach would be misused.

Why didn't he just say we hold evidence sufficient to justify these steps, and I can't comment further.

This is a good post. We see it on this forum. IMO, the level of conviction HCW has shown through quotes like this has convinced people of CB’s guilt. It’s driven by the very reasonable though that “How could he say such things unless he was absolutely certain?”

The problem for me is that HCW and the BKA may well have convinced themselves. He is a likely suspect. A phone number he had used was used on the night of the disappearance in the area. He changed the rego on the Jag. He’s bragged about knowing what happened to MM.

Trouble is, there is no physical evidence that we are aware of.

 

[Denis R Tandib]

Germany has no lay jury

This is true but HCW has tried and convicted CB for the murder of MM in the media without any scrutiny or accountability. While I agree that CB is a truly awful person, the way he has been treated is not right.

 

[enquirer6]

This is true but HCW has tried and convicted CB for the murder of MM in the media without any scrutiny or accountability. While I agree that CB is a truly awful person, the way he has been treated is not right.

Amaral wrote a book directly accusing the McCanns, but not of murder, which is what the enquiry he nominally headed did accuse them of.

Was that right?

 

[enquirer6]

This is the most up-to-date information on Julia Wendell:

'You can't hide anymore': Private detective challenges family of woman claiming to be Madeleine McCann

The private detective investigating the case of a woman claiming to be Madeleine McCann said 'you can't hide anymore' in a warning to the family who raised the now 21-year-old.

www.lbc.co.uk