IMO, logic would dictate that if the evidence in the MM case is as strong as in the other cases, he would have been charged.
Let’s not forget that on 11 May 2022, when asked how the MM investigation was progressing, HCW said;
"in principle, complete, and over the next few days his lawyer will be able to examine the files. I don't know what the result will be. We will have to hear what his lawyer says. We need to wait and see the extent of the charges we will bring."
You and others keep saying that the five other charges are connected to the MM case. Conversely, on 13 October 2022, HCW stated:
“In principle, none. Whether Christian B. has anything to do with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann or not is to be judged completely independently of the current charges."
Why don’t you believe what he says?
Also, why would it surprise you that his defence counsel is trying to prevent any of the cases going to trial?
I am not basing my view on anything other than the contradicting information that HCW has provided. From this, he had evidence to charge and was going to charge 18 months ago, and the others cases are unrelated to the MM case.
Doubting his case against CB is very logical.