... In the society that Orwell describes, everyone is under complete surveillance by the authorities, mainly by telescreens.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Brother_(Nineteen_Eighty-Four)
No. In the book 1984, the general public is
not monitored, they didn't have to be. Posters of Big Brother, a use of limited vocabulary in media, and Fox News style fear-based television was all that was needed to keep the masses from revolting. The general public was, in Orwell's very word, "free." Though "free," they still lived in a nightmarish society with collapsing infrastructure, lack of proper health care, recurring wars, and, almost ironically, not too much government but basically no government whatsoever. Government in that book was too busy monitoring and oppressing its own members to actually govern.
Only those who were part of the government itself were subject to telescreen monitoring. Protagonist Winston Smith saw that the only hope for reform was thus with the only part of society free from government spying: the general public, the proles.
I'm pretty sure that the voice in our own society that tries to portray sexual matters as "dirty" isn't from pot smoking "leftists" who listen to George Carlin and Doug Stanhope so much as the more conservative fundamentalist christians. But I very strongly agree with the suggestion that "zero tolerance" often means zero justice, and that "zero tolerance" has no place in a thinking society.
I don't know what was right in this case, and to consider this matter properly, we need the complete facts, including some good photographs of this possibly smokin' hot teacher. :innocent: