Bartleby
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
- Messages
- 120
- Reaction score
- 1
I still think he doesn't have an alibi because he was expecting not to need one before his plan got diverted. He was probably thinking he'd play the victim of jilted husband at the end of the week or whenever, claiming she was there and he went on this camping trip and she was gone when he came back.
Your post prompted me to look up the dictionary meaning of "alibi", because I was unsure of the true meaning.
You're right, Josh doesn't HAVE an alibi as I currently understand it, because he has failed to demonstrate where he was when Susan went missing. He has spun this camping story, but has failed to present any evidence to LE back it up, and refused to give them the help they need to verify the story.
It is probably too late now to prove his alibi through physica evidence (assuming he didn't manufacture some). His two boys might be able to verify that he drove somewhere at night, and maybe they actually did the s'mores thing <shudder>, but I doubt they would be very useful witnesses in court.