Seattle1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 39,160
- Reaction score
- 408,031
BT is expected to enter a not guilty plea at his arraignment.I don't think his attorneys believe he is guilty or not guilty. It doesn't matter to them, and I'm sure they haven't asked him. Their responsibility is to assure that he gets a fail trial -- that's all. But we know they will do a bit more that than. During the case discussion with him, if they ask him if he did it, and he says "yes," then they can't ask him to testify . To ask him if he killed her -- as if they would, and he is under oath on the witness stand, and he says, "No I did not," the the attys will be guilty of suborning perjury. Suborning perjury is serious -- Here a little more info:
Subornation of perjury - Wikipedia
Do you have any thoughts on BT's defense and/or what theory they will put forward to defend BT against the charge of murder?
That was really the point of my post -- seeking possible defense theories.