Clutchbag,
the reason it is possible to say the dna on the card fobb is from gerry, whilst it is not possible to say madeleine contributed to the material in the boot is because the material on the fobb came from one individuel, whereas the material in th eboot came from three to five people, and no allele could be attributed to coming from the same person.
If the 15 allleles that madeleine shared could have been shown to come from one person, then that woudl have been conclusive it was madeleine's. But it was impossible to ascertain this, all that could be said was that those 15 alleles could have come from 1,2,3, 4, or 5 people and that those 15 alleles woudl be found in the parents, grandparents, and to a lesser extent other relatives dna and that they all used the car.
sapphire,
I really do not see how you can type that about the dna, it is wrong. The material found in the boot consisted of 37 different alleles, and there was no way to tell according to lowe if it cam from the mccanns or one of their children so it is untrue that 19 of them were identified as belonging to a mccann child. I do not see why you are now claiming that the material came from both her parents and therefore must be hers? It sounds as if you have read what I wrote about inheritance and got confused, because I am sorry but it is clear you do not understand what the lowe report actually says about the material found.
It is also untrue that the evrd alerted to the spot where this material was found. The evrd alerted to the place where gerry mccanns dna was found.
and I have never heard of wikileaks being hacked.
I also do not see why you are claiming that gerry mckinnon found information to do with the mccanns. h he was caught hacking five years before madeleine disappeared - are you claiming the us government had infomation in the pentagon about covering up the disappearence of a child from the north of england before she was even conceived? because you quite clearly stated mcKinnon was involved in uncovering this?
You have also never shown proof of a cover-up. the wikileaks cable (which if people could be bothered was avai;able via foi requests so not exactly hidden), mentions nothing of a cover-up, or ambassadors helping. It simple states that the Uk ambassador gossiped with the US ambassador about a topic in the world news and said he thought that the currect evidence against the mccanns [which at this point was the dogs and the dna examination] was developed by the british police. Not exactly shocking as the files state that the british police helped to bring in the dogs, and get the fss to look at the dna. No where does it say the british police first suspected the mccanns. You have claimed the cable states things which it does not.
as for gerry being a heart surgeon. he is a cardiologist, a different thing. The fact that his title is Dr is a clue as in the Uk surgeons (who reach a certain level) are referred to as MR, but physicians remain as Dr even though they reach consultancy level (and gerry is a consultant).
the claims that have been made to try to implicate the mccanns are bordering on the absurd. I mean we have had accusations of three way international governmental cover-ups, claim a man caught hacking five years before the child disappeared had uncovered evidence of a coverup, accusations of freemasonary (how exactly does that make someone a criminal anyway), claims that finding the matching alleles in a mixed sample is indicitive it belongs to madeleine, claims that grime, harrison and operation rectangle are all wrong about the evrds abilities, oh and that operation rectangle somehow covered up child murders, claims that the mccanns moved a body around in front of hundreds of witnesses, claims that scotland yard do not know what they are doing, claims that if someone is convicted of a crime they are not a criminal unless their prison sentance is not suspended, claims that violence towards women is acceptable, claims that torturing people until they say what the torturer wants to hear is OK in police investigations etc. Is it any wonder these claims do not get taken seriously by anyone in any form of authority?
the fact is thta not one person has put up proof of any evidence against the mccanns, whilst people have demonstrated that it is in fact posisble for a stranger to walk in via an unlocked door, pick a child up and walk out again. Plus people have linked to scotland yard stating they believe it was a stranger, as well as to information about the other break ins in the complex.
If people are so sure of the mccanns guilt, then demonstrate the evidence against them and contact the police. But no-one has. In real life as it were people like tony bennett have claimed their documents contain truth but have failed spectaculary to demonstrate this, and have ended up in court again and again (and not just for libeling the mccanns). the british media admitted they wrote stories with not a shred of evidence, and Lord Justice leveson confirmed that the mccanns had been victims of untrue accusations and defamation. There is just not one shred of evidence that supports the nasty accusations made against them.
