NV - 59 Dead, over 500 injured in Mandalay Bay shooting in Las Vegas, 1 Oct 2017 #6

Status
Not open for further replies.
No one talks about the two shots at the end. SP has two (2) gunshot wounds. One on his chest and one in his mouth. Which one killed him? two shots are recorded. Can I say WTF?
 
The Mind Of A Mass Murderer: Charles Whitman, Brain Damage, And Violence


"Whitman knew that something was wrong. His note further reads, “After my death I wish that an autopsy would be performed on me to see if there is any visible physical disorder.”

And
indeed there was. Whitman was found to have a glioblastoma, a type of brain tumor, pressing against regions of the brain thought to be responsible for the regulation of strong emotions."

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/27/mind-murderer_n_1384102.html


and in a bizarre way it fits with Eric and his dad. By that I mean mom (speculation )
- after dads history was revealed -- can pic
mom saying oh your dad was sick in the head something was wrong with his brain

that kind of thing
 
No one talks about the two shots at the end. SP has two (2) gunshot wounds. One on his chest and one in his mouth. Which one killed him? two shots are recorded. Can I say WTF?
Ya that's another head scratcher IMO
One was a test shot someone said earlier on here, then someone else said why test the gun? Its going to work or not. You missed a good chuckle lol

Sent from my SM-T320 using Tapatalk
 
No one talks about the two shots at the end. SP has two (2) gunshot wounds. One on his chest and one in his mouth. Which one killed him? two shots are recorded. Can I say WTF?

Mr Fudenberg said he would await findings of multiple forensic analyses at Stanford, including a neuropathological examination of Paddock's brain tissue, before issuing a finding on a cause and manner of his death.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...brain-study-stanford-university-a8000221.html
 
Yes. The first 2 shots were at the tanks as per one of Sheriff's statements which I cant search for now cos have ill animals and busy.. but thats what threw the timeline off completely
Thats part of the reason we're all disagreeing so much..
Because, of the reported fracas with JC, then the fracas with sG 2, maintenance man, then smash two v big windows with a small hammer. pics of hammer in most Dailymail articles.. It had a yellow stripe on it..
We cannot figure out how he smashed those massive windows.
If he had done it before he shot the 2 employees every alarm in the entire city should have gone off.. but nobody reported that.
An article at beginning of this thread described an eye witness account, he stated he was looking at the hotel and he saw what looked like an explosion
Charlotte observer was media source.. just afew hours ago..
He also described seeing sheets of glass falling..
He did not go into a timeline though..
I have read lots of accounts of firecrackers going off in close proximity to the stage just before the shooting started..

Moocow.. would tracers ever sound like firecrackers?

But breaking 2 mega windows is something that should take quite a bit of time.. he or somebody dID break them before presumably taking shots at the tanks.. sure he could have had his gun lined up with his measurements, wind velocity, the works, all ready to go.. and he could possibly have carried that task out quite quickly..
Also he must have had time to finish his drilling as well cos cops had to bust it wide open when they decided breach was safe.

Theres an awful lot of questions that could have been answered but were not and they are basic questions, commonsense questions.. partly for catharsis and also for curiosity.
Mostly for respect for the families of those who died or were wounded..
Imagine trying to picture how your child died in those circumstances... imagine..................

-That was my curiosity purpose of going back through to see if there was more reported basics than I am recalling. There isn’t, and that is not normal. I’m not talking about forensic this or that.

-Does anyone have the narrative from the Sheriff when he said “You will never get me to....” I’m paraphrasing the rest of it, but something like ‘never get me to go back, retreat, revise??? I am curious if the FBI or MB were hoping they could all be of one shiny accord prior to the release of ‘facts’ at the first presser. Maybe the sheriff was genuine in looking out for JC that early on because he anticipated some bs from FBI or MB?

-I’m trying to check every angle of how the 60MINUTES episode could be presented with confidence? I don’t recall if mentioned in the interview that they were stumped then (on air) for an accurate timeline? And it was aired before the SG shot time was changed.
 
But shooting a tank won't explode it. It's not the movies. So let's say that's the plan. Explode something huge THEN shoot? What's the point in that? That likely would have killed anyone close by. So all that work setting up this sniper nest to explode something THEN shoot? Not buying it.
And are those shots that hit the tanks on purpose? Guns spray especially with the bump stock.. Moo

Sent from my SM-T320 using Tapatalk

His planning was flawed considering he didn't suspect open doors would set off silent alarms. Given that he packed up 23 weapons and escape gear, along with descriptions of his oddball and antisocial behaviour by others says to me the outcome of his ultimate plan was grandiose in design. Who knows, if the fuel tanks exploded perhaps the weapons were to be used on police, firefighters and emergency personnel as they attended the scene of the explosion. I recall the sheriff mentioning it appeared SP intentionally turned gunfire toward the police officers converging on the scene.
 
Exactly. It's like how LE has stated that the security guard interrupted the mass shooting, so the logical conclusion is that he stopped the shooting and he's a hero!

Or maybe he was shot 6 minutes before the mass shooting began, and despite contacting his dispatch, no one called 911, so really the evidence shows he could have possibly done more to stop the shooting but didn't.

OR, maybe he was shot merely seconds before SP opened fire on the concert attendees?

Sigh...

Is it because Campos is Hispanic? I don't have a problem with Hispanic people so I'm trying to figure out why some people consider him to be worse than the killer.

Are there some folks now who support Paddock and feel what he did was ok? Just trying to get a reading on where some of the victim blaming is coming from.

Schuck stated when he arrived on the floor, Campos was wounded, bleeding pretty heavily.

Campos was unarmed and injured. Short of storming the locked door and beating Paddock with his fists, there was no way he could physically stop him.

Campos immediately radioed the dispatch center and told them about the shooting and where it was coming from

Campos was concerned the dispatch center/management understand Paddock was shooting, so he also called them on his cell phone, too

When Schuck showed up, he told him about the shooting and to take cover. Schuck says Campos saved his life, as Paddock began shooting just after that.

All of the above has been documented in PC's and interviews in the news media.

The guy who killed these people is dead and LE is investigating to find out why and who else might have been involved.

Campos movements have been recorded on bodycam and security video, as well as audio from his radio and phone. He's not a suspect or POI, he's a victim.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...-gunman-moments-lv-shooting-article-1.3555300
 
-That was my curiosity purpose of going back through to see if there was more reported basics than I am recalling. There isn’t, and that is not normal. I’m not talking about forensic this or that.

-Does anyone have the narrative from the Sheriff when he said “You will never get me to....” I’m paraphrasing the rest of it, but something like ‘never get me to go back, retreat, revise??? I am curious if the FBI or MB were hoping they could all be of one shiny accord prior to the release of ‘facts’ at the first presser. Maybe the sheriff was genuine in looking out for JC that early on because he anticipated some bs from FBI or MB?

-I’m trying to check every angle of how the 60MINUTES episode could be presented with confidence? I don’t recall if mentioned in the interview that they were stumped then (on air) for an accurate timeline? And it was aired before the SG shot time was changed.

Very good point.
did they discuss timelines in that programme?
Might be important?
 
In that depo at one point he says something like some nights in one sitting I would go through a million dollars

that is amazing money laundering or delusions !!

He playing a little pull down a handle machine - it is just silly

its funny kinda in movies in high stake drama gambling there doing cards or something

just visualize a million dollars on one of these ::

from:
https://lh5.ggpht.com/JqlNU90csUmHciq9GF0pdoeUA19uQIc3-I2hRd1FwP3ai7Z_jUno8eecGDhLRlx3DA1m=h900

JqlNU90csUmHciq9GF0pdoeUA19uQIc3-I2hRd1FwP3ai7Z_jUno8eecGDhLRlx3DA1m=h900





just silly imo !!

google images
 
The cost comes in when monitoring 500+ more, not in purchasing them.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

ETA "cost"

They don't need to be monitored to be useful. Ahhhh that just made me think. Is there a difference between "surveillance cameras" and "security cameras"??

Maybe what they are implying when they say they don't have surveillance cameras in the hallways is that they don't have, as you said, "monitored" cameras.... hmmmm... and that would explain the link i posted earlier that shows evidence of there actually being cameras in the hallways at MBay.
 
I've been studying the stock prices for MGM, including the day after the mass shootings.

On Oct 2nd there was the highest volume of trading since February of this year.

Stock price of MGM was lower from the beginning months of the year than October 2nd.

http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/mgm/stock-chart
 
The millions/billions of dollars at stake concerning this whole situation is astounding.

I refer to both the stock price of MGM as well as future business at Mandalay Resort hotel.

In my opinion, it is in the interest of the stockholders of MGM to see this investigation wrapped up as soon as possible. The changing of the timeline will, of course, help this.

I am in no way suggesting a conspiracy - just looking at the possibility the force of money and power to put a closure to the investigation.


Mandalay Resorts Group was purchased by MGM Mirage in 2005 for 7.9 billion dollars.

"Billionaire dealmaker Kirk Kerkorian, majority shareholder of MGM Mirage, made a rare public appearance at Tuesday's hearing. In an interview with reporters, Kerkorian repeatedly praised Lanni and Murren for their skill in crafting and promoting the deal."

"MGM Mirage will have about $13.3 billion in long term debt once it buys Mandalay and before it sells a casino in Detroit. "

https://lasvegassun.com/news/2005/fe...ry-officials-/
 
WTF - what "brain tissue" evidence could show for anything? He shot himself in the head. What kind of brain tissue could be left? Also - what kind of "brain tissue" information could possibly be gleaned even from a healthy adult? Sounds like absolute CRAP to me.

Whatever's left they want to examine it. Autopsies can take months. So far there is no official COD (as far as I can tell), so I don't think there's an answer to your "Which shot killed him?" question.
 
just the color of skin does not radiate this picture of health to be lugging all this around smashing out hurricane force windows with a child's hammer !

If all those people were not hurt its a horrible sit com at best imo
 
I've been studying the stock prices for MGM, including the day after the mass shootings.

On Oct 2nd there was the highest volume of trading since February of this year.

Stock price of MGM was lower from the beginning months of the year than October 2nd.

http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/mgm/stock-chart
Ahhh I was hoping someone with a financial background or some stock knowledge would chime in. Makes sense people are offloading the day after?

Sent from my SM-T320 using Tapatalk
 
We can't just post phone numbers that have been associated with SP at some point in time and start sleuthing on any old name that seems to have also been associated with any of those numbers. Even if they are somehow related to SP (friends, relatives, exes, etc.), we can't sleuth them.

Example: I moved last year and just popped my old phone number into google. Hits come up indicating the number is also associated with two people whose names I have never heard of.
 
Very good point.
did they discuss timelines in that programme?
Might be important?

-I can’t say for certainty without seeing it again but I think I would have remembered them mentioning it🤷🏻*♀️
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
275
Guests online
1,502
Total visitors
1,777

Forum statistics

Threads
597,570
Messages
18,066,722
Members
230,394
Latest member
bloomoon
Back
Top