Fairy1
VOTE!!!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2008
- Messages
- 10,278
- Reaction score
- 3,433
I guess just come out and say it? people do take things personally sometimes but they will get over it. the only times I get into trouble are when I have a "tone" to my post or people perceive that I do. I am working on sounding more neutral and I think it is working lol. also some things seem like they would be easy to look up but with 20 threads and thousands and thousands of posts and it is soooo easy to miss something or take a long time to catch up. I think when I first started posting I just felt like I was expected to know everything already and I still don't! trust me, your information *is* helpful, esp the timeline etc but it can be hard at first when you have questions. also sometimes people have read bits of info given out but they still question how thoroughly something was checked, or they just see it differently?? like phone records etc being checked, stuff can always be missed so even though I know they were checked, I find it hard to believe there are not some major clues there.
I truly believe there are major clues in the phone records. Perhaps if some folks (not here!) would expand their definition of "out of the ordinary," it would become more evident??? Looking for a stranger with ties to SCA may be a bit short-sighted, I'm thinking.
BBM. It seems counter-intuitive right? But there dont seem to be any major clues whatsoever. I am also a fan of the "bat phone" theory IE disposable cell phone where Steven's actual plans and calls might have been communicated.
Now, we did find out he used the library computers, which *appear* not to have been checked for his activity. Forgive the astericks-it is because I am not 100% sure
He did use the library computers and no, they were never checked. Personally, I assume if there was an electronic trail, that's where it would be.