NY - Congressman George Santos charged with 13 criminal counts, May 2023

Rep. Santos says he's protecting family members by seeking to keep bond cosigners secret

Rep. George Santos wants to protect family members by asking the courts to keep his bond cosigners secret as he fights criminal charges, his lawyer told a Long Island federal judge Friday as he asked her to reverse a magistrate judge’s decision to make the names public.

Attorney Joseph Murray said in a letter to Judge Joanna Seybert that Santos would agree to the disclosure that there is a “family” relationship between the Republican congressman and those who signed his bond.

News media outlets have challenged the sealing of records regarding the cosigners after Santos pleaded not guilty on May 10 to a 13-count indictment charging that he duped donors, stole from his campaign, lied to Congress about being a millionaire and cheated to collect unemployment benefits he didn’t deserve.
 
I almost didn't recognize him getting hounded by the press with that smirk wiped off his lying face!

ALTHOUGH I was sorely disappointed he did not wear that red sequined dress to his arraignment.
What’s with the red sequined dress?
 
Friday, June 30th:
*Pretrial Hearing (@ am) - NY - U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York vs. Rep. George Anthony Devolder Santos (34) indicted & charged (5/8/23) & arrested & arraigned (5/10/23) with 7 counts of wire fraud, 3 counts of money laundering, 1 count of theft of public funds ($24K) & 2 counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives. Plead not guilty. Released (5/10/23) on $500K bond. Surrendered his passports & has travel restrictions.
U.S. representative for New York's 3rd congressional district, serving since Jan. 7, 2023.
Breon Peace, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Kenneth A. Polite, Jr., Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, and Michael J. Driscoll, Assistant Director-in-Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office (FBI), & Anne T. Donnelly, District Attorney, Nassau County, announced the charges.
The government’s case is being prosecuted by the Office’s Public Integrity Section, the Long Island Criminal Division & the Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section. Assistant United States Attorneys Ryan Harris, Anthony Bagnuola, & Laura Zuckerwise, along with Trial Attorneys Jolee Porter & Jacob Steiner, are in charge of the prosecution with assistance from Paralegal Specialist Rachel Friedman. Senior Litigation Counsel Victor R. Salgado of the Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section provided substantial contributions to the prosecution.

5/9/23 Update: The indictment was returned yesterday under seal by a federal grand jury sitting in Central Islip, New York. Santos was arrested this morning & will be arraigned this afternoon, 5/10/23 before U.S. Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay at the federal courthouse in Central Islip, New York. The charges in the indictment are merely allegations & the defendant is presumed innocent unless & until proven guilty. If convicted of the charges, Santos faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison for the top counts. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines & other statutory factors.
5/10/23 Update: The indictment says Santos induced supporters to donate to a company under the false pretense that the money would be used to support his campaign. Instead, it says, he used it for personal expenses, including luxury designer clothes & to pay off his credit cards. He is accused of lying about his finances on congressional disclosure forms & applying for & receiving unemployment benefits while he was employed as regional director of an investment firm & running for Congress. Santos plead not guilty to charges of fraud, money laundering & theft of public funds. Released on a $500K bond. Santos also surrendered his passport. Also, his travel outside of DC/NYC/LI must be pre approved. Santos’ attorney noted his re-election campaign, saying he wants to have “freedom to engage” in that The judge reiterated that if it’s outside those areas, it needs approval. US Magistrate Judge Anne Shields allowed Santos to be released on a $500,000 bond that would be cosigned by three different suretors who would guarantee the bail funds. The judge held a secret hearing with the three people on the hook for his $500K bond & went to extraordinary lengths to keep their identities secret, according to a new court filing. Santos was arraigned in federal court on Long Island on 5/10/23, pleading not guilty to a 13-count criminal indictment where federal prosecutors alleged he stole funds from political donors meant for campaign expenses, illegally took pandemic unemployment payouts & lied to Congress on financial forms. The secrecy surrounding the identities of the three guarantors means that the public has no way of knowing who is ensuring that Santos, an elected official, is allowed to stay out of jail ahead of a trial on the criminal charges against him.
5/25/23 Update: In a letter filed to court Wednesday, Dana R. Green, a lawyer for The New York Times, said the court held another secret hearing with the sponsors. It's unclear whether the hearing was overseen by Shields or US District Judge Joanna Seybert, to whom Santos's case has since been assigned. The Times's letter asked Seybert to unseal any bond records, as well as the transcript of the sealed hearing with the bail sponsors. Criminal defendants sometimes ask judges to keep the names & other personal details of their bond sponsors under seal. Back in court on 6/30/23.
6/6/23 Update: U.S. Magistrate Judge Anne Shields on Tuesday granted media organizations’ requests to unseal the names of the people who cosigned Santos’s $500K bond in his criminal fraud case. The order is a blow to Santos, whose attorney Monday asked a judge to keep the names of the bond cosigners sealed. The congressman’s lawyer, Joseph Murray, expressed concern for the sponsors should their identities be revealed, citing a “media frenzy” around the Santos case. “If this Court is so inclined to unseal the sureties, we truly fear for their health, safety & well being,” Murray said. U.S. Magistrate Judge Anne Shields gave Santos until noon Friday, 6/9/23 to appeal the ruling, ordering the names to remain under seal in the meantime. Murray previously indicated Santos would rather go to jail ahead of trial rather than allow the suretors to face the public attention. “My client would rather surrender to pretrial detainment than subject these suretors to what will inevitably come,” Murray said
6/9/23 Update: Rep. George Santos wants to protect family members by asking the courts to keep his bond cosigners secret as he fights criminal charges, his lawyer told a Long Island federal judge Friday as he asked her to reverse a magistrate judge’s decision to make the names public. Attorney Joseph Murray said in a letter to Judge Joanna Seybert that Santos would agree to the disclosure that there is a “family” relationship between the Republican congressman & those who signed his bond.
6/22/23 Update: Santos' bond co-signers have been unsealed. His father, Gercino dos Santos, Jr. & his aunt, Elma Santos Preven are the co-signers for the %500K bond.
 

July 1, 2023 - 11 hours ago

CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. (AP) — Prosecutors said Friday that they have turned over more than 80,000 pages of materials to U.S. Rep. George Santos ’ lawyers in the federal fraud and money laundering case against him.


The documents weren’t publicly released, as is common during this stage of a case. The barely five-minute hearing at a Long Island federal courthouse focused on the case schedule, with the next court date set for Sept. 7.
[......]
Federal prosecutors have charged Santos with 13 counts of wire fraud, money laundering, theft of public funds and making false statements to Congress. He faces up to 20 years in prison if convicted.


Taken together, the allegations suggest Santos relied on “repeated dishonesty and deception to ascend to the halls of Congress and enrich himself,” according to U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York Breon Peace.
[.....]
As part of his bond agreement, Santos must notify the court if he plans to travel outside of New York or Washington, D.C. He said he received permission to do so this week before flying to El Paso, Texas, where he called for increased border security and brushed off questions about the federal investigation.
 
It's infuriating to know that so many people were aware of his record and behavior well in advance of the election and yet none of that information was ever made available to the voters. How are voters to make an informed decision if candidate information is hidden? I shudder to wonder how often this happens. Party over country, indeed.
 
According to court filings and facts presented during the plea proceeding, Marks was the treasurer for the principal congressional campaign committee of a candidate for the United States House of Representatives during the 2022 election cycle in New York’s Third Congressional District (the “Candidate”). During this election cycle, Marks and the candidate devised and executed a fraudulent scheme to obtain money for the campaign by submitting materially false reports to the FEC on behalf of the campaign in which they inflated the campaign’s fundraising numbers for the purpose of misleading the FEC, a national party committee, and the public.

Specifically, the purpose of the scheme was to ensure that the Candidate and his campaign qualified for a program administered by the national party committee, pursuant to which the national party committee would provide financial and logistical support to the Candidate and his campaign committee. To qualify for the program, the Candidate had to demonstrate, among other things, that his congressional campaign had raised at least $250,000 from third-party contributors in a single quarter.

To meet that financial benchmark and to further demonstrate to the national party committee that the congressional candidate’s campaign was financially viable, Marks and the Candidate agreed to falsely report to the FEC that at least 10 family members of Marks and the Candidate had made contributions to the campaign, when Marks and the Candidate both knew that these individuals had not made the reported contributions. In addition, Marks and the Candidate agreed to falsely report to the FEC that the congressional candidate had loaned the campaign significant sums of money, including in one instance a $500,000 loan, when, in fact, the congressional candidate had not made the reported loans and, at the time the loans were reported, did not have the funds necessary to make such loans.

 
According to court filings and facts presented during the plea proceeding, Marks was the treasurer for the principal congressional campaign committee of a candidate for the United States House of Representatives during the 2022 election cycle in New York’s Third Congressional District (the “Candidate”). During this election cycle, Marks and the candidate devised and executed a fraudulent scheme to obtain money for the campaign by submitting materially false reports to the FEC on behalf of the campaign in which they inflated the campaign’s fundraising numbers for the purpose of misleading the FEC, a national party committee, and the public.

Specifically, the purpose of the scheme was to ensure that the Candidate and his campaign qualified for a program administered by the national party committee, pursuant to which the national party committee would provide financial and logistical support to the Candidate and his campaign committee. To qualify for the program, the Candidate had to demonstrate, among other things, that his congressional campaign had raised at least $250,000 from third-party contributors in a single quarter.

To meet that financial benchmark and to further demonstrate to the national party committee that the congressional candidate’s campaign was financially viable, Marks and the Candidate agreed to falsely report to the FEC that at least 10 family members of Marks and the Candidate had made contributions to the campaign, when Marks and the Candidate both knew that these individuals had not made the reported contributions. In addition, Marks and the Candidate agreed to falsely report to the FEC that the congressional candidate had loaned the campaign significant sums of money, including in one instance a $500,000 loan, when, in fact, the congressional candidate had not made the reported loans and, at the time the loans were reported, did not have the funds necessary to make such loans.


So... why is GS still in Congress again?

Hopefully the charlatan is replaced by an honest dealer next time round.
 
According to court filings and facts presented during the plea proceeding, Marks was the treasurer for the principal congressional campaign committee of a candidate for the United States House of Representatives during the 2022 election cycle in New York’s Third Congressional District (the “Candidate”). During this election cycle, Marks and the candidate devised and executed a fraudulent scheme to obtain money for the campaign by submitting materially false reports to the FEC on behalf of the campaign in which they inflated the campaign’s fundraising numbers for the purpose of misleading the FEC, a national party committee, and the public.

Specifically, the purpose of the scheme was to ensure that the Candidate and his campaign qualified for a program administered by the national party committee, pursuant to which the national party committee would provide financial and logistical support to the Candidate and his campaign committee. To qualify for the program, the Candidate had to demonstrate, among other things, that his congressional campaign had raised at least $250,000 from third-party contributors in a single quarter.

To meet that financial benchmark and to further demonstrate to the national party committee that the congressional candidate’s campaign was financially viable, Marks and the Candidate agreed to falsely report to the FEC that at least 10 family members of Marks and the Candidate had made contributions to the campaign, when Marks and the Candidate both knew that these individuals had not made the reported contributions. In addition, Marks and the Candidate agreed to falsely report to the FEC that the congressional candidate had loaned the campaign significant sums of money, including in one instance a $500,000 loan, when, in fact, the congressional candidate had not made the reported loans and, at the time the loans were reported, did not have the funds necessary to make such loans.


That answers the question where he got all that money to loan to his campaign -- it never happened, he lied to the FEC.
 
George Santos has been charged with conspiracy in a SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT. He now faces 23 felony counts.

 
Last edited:
George Santos has been charged with conspiracy in a SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT. He now faces 23 felony counts.

Oh no!!!!!!

Anyway…….
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
85
Guests online
1,295
Total visitors
1,380

Forum statistics

Threads
596,556
Messages
18,049,554
Members
230,029
Latest member
myauris11
Back
Top