No. He probably did not re-enter the bar. He most likely went through a door leading to a hallway adjacent to the bar. From there he may have gone down to the lower level and entered the construction area.
Yes, I believe so.
Respectfully, you’re assuming he did not make it back to his apartment that night. He could have easily taken an alternate exit and walked down Pearl alley the entire way, unseen by people and/or cameras. His girlfriend was out of town all weekend, and no one went to his apartment. He wasn’t even noticed to be missing until Sunday. This really may not have been the clandestine escape everyone assumes it was.
Clint was subpoenaed but refused to answer the prosecutor’s questions at the advice of his attorney. He exercised his 5th amendment privilege. Make of that what you will.
That is mere hearsay. What I'd make of Clint never having been indicted, if a prosecutor even took it to a grand jury, is that there was no case. Which is probably why no civil case. This is why grand jury is secret - people talk even if there was no case and a no-bill decision is returned. Like you are. Guessing that he pled the fifth on the record. Please.
It’s not hearsay that a prosecutor took it to a grand jury, Detective Hurst has stated this. He also said Clint refused to answer the questions provided. The only way you can do that is to plead the 5th. I agree that they obviously did not then have the evidence needed to pursue a case.
I've listened to everything I know of from Hurst. Could you tell me where to hear him say prosecutor presented case against Clint before a grand jury - I've heard no such thing from Hurst or any other official. I'd be shocked to learn that Hurst had done something so wrong and reckless - grand jury actions are to be kept under wraps. Thx in advance.
You're not missing anything, itsrak. Hurst has never said that Clint was the target of the grand jury investigation. The grand jury was almost certainly convened in order to determine whether a crime had occurred, which is a common use of a grand jury in some jurisdictions. In other words, there were no charges to be brought against anyone because they never even determined that there was foul play. It most most likely a fishing expedition where they were digging for information by asking Clint anything and everything. I wouldn't have participated, either.
I'm glad that you cleared that up, because you're previous posts seemed to imply that Clint was a target of the grand jury investigation as opposed to simply a witness.
