OH Pike Co., 8 in Rhoden Family Murdered Over Custody Issue, 4 Members Wagner Family Arrested #52

Discussion in 'Recently Sentenced and Beyond' started by tlcya, Jul 29, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Rutledge203

    Rutledge203 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I agree with you. Thanks.
     


  2. Loomis124

    Loomis124 Former Member

    Messages:
    3,032
    Likes Received:
    10,324
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Brian Reader is not charged with anything, IIRC.
     
  3. evelezrn

    evelezrn Registered Nurse

    Messages:
    644
    Likes Received:
    2,463
    Trophy Points:
    93
    In my opinion, I would think they argued this prior to voir dire (probably in chambers). Jury selection would have taken way longer than this. JMO.

    ETA:

    10TV: First trial connected to Pike County family slayings delayed.
    First trial connected to Pike County family slayings delayed

    WAVERLY, Ohio — A judge has delayed what was supposed to be the first trial connected to the investigation into the 2016 slayings of eight family members in Ohio.
    Prosecutors said Monday that both sides agreed to postpone the trial for Rita Newcomb just as jury selection was to begin.
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2019
  4. Merrygirl

    Merrygirl Verified R.N.

    Messages:
    462
    Likes Received:
    2,257
    Trophy Points:
    93
    ‘I’m sure they did collect but was it planted beforehand? I don’t believe it was but is that Gerlach’s intent?
     
    Caylee Advocate likes this.
  5. Rutledge203

    Rutledge203 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Thank you
     
    Berrybell and evelezrn like this.
  6. sunshineray

    sunshineray Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,131
    Likes Received:
    23,736
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Am I missing something? Isn't this the same motion that was just denied on this past Friday?
     
  7. GoBuckeyes

    GoBuckeyes Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    9,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
  8. Rutledge203

    Rutledge203 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I think you are right. Time will tell.
     
    Puzzles8, Cool Cats and GoBuckeyes like this.
  9. evelezrn

    evelezrn Registered Nurse

    Messages:
    644
    Likes Received:
    2,463
    Trophy Points:
    93
  10. GoBuckeyes

    GoBuckeyes Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    9,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Agree! Very disappointing.
     
  11. Johnny B Bad

    Johnny B Bad Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,910
    Likes Received:
    9,907
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So is Judge Deering is at the age limit to try capital cases after the first of the year?
     
    Puzzles8, Cool Cats and GoBuckeyes like this.
  12. sunshineray

    sunshineray Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,131
    Likes Received:
    23,736
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There you go, it was denied but now defense is agreeing with a delay and it will be a hearing next time in court, not the start of trial with jury selection. And the jurors today were excused.

    What the heck is going on?
     
  13. GoBuckeyes

    GoBuckeyes Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    9,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Same in the Ohio county where I live.
     
  14. sunshineray

    sunshineray Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,131
    Likes Received:
    23,736
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Whaaat?!
     
    Cool Cats likes this.
  15. GoBuckeyes

    GoBuckeyes Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    9,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It would seem (only my opinion) that they would need to return. Otherwise, defense attornies could use this "trick" anytime they didn't like the prospective jury?? Just thinking outloud here. I could easily be completely wrong.
     
    Merrygirl, Cool Cats and Rutledge203 like this.
  16. Rutledge203

    Rutledge203 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I'm so confused and rambling at this point, I need to regroup. My brain has lost too many cells.
    I'll be back. :eek:
     
  17. GoBuckeyes

    GoBuckeyes Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    9,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Mine too, Rutledge.
     
  18. Loomis124

    Loomis124 Former Member

    Messages:
    3,032
    Likes Received:
    10,324
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanks for sharing. When will Gerlach learn? And what a lowdown, dirty deed to only send it to Junk!
     
    Puzzles8, Rutledge203 and GoBuckeyes like this.
  19. GoBuckeyes

    GoBuckeyes Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    9,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A question was posed previously concerning age limits and whether or not JW was pushing his trial date back to take advantage of that, if there is indeed such a limit. I think that's what JBB is asking about with Judge Deering. Am I close JBB?
     
  20. GoBuckeyes

    GoBuckeyes Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    9,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I missed it. What happened? Gerlach only turned over the information at the 11th hour to 1/3 of the prosecution by sending it to Junk?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice